This letter has torn away the fig leaf of domestic films. Where should domestic films go?

Do we have the right to criticize this movie? Of course we do. The answer is so obvious, but the current public opinion environment seems to disagree with this more and more. Let me talk about something that caused a lot of noise a while ago. The incident was initially a turmoil in a small circle, but due to the subsequent chaos, it went out of the circle. The reason was that users using Douban gave a two-star review to a book called Truce. Subsequently, the translator of this book A response was made, so far it was within the scope of rational discussion, but then an email made the situation worse, the sender was a friend of the translator and the receiver was a teacher who rated the user, in electronic In the email, the rating user was described as a "confused student" and the school was asked to help him make a "public apology" and "false statements." ?

Subsequently, the rating users issued an apology statement and deleted the brief review. Only when things got to this point did they officially exit the circle, which was separated from the book review itself and expanded on another hot topic: readers' opinions on There were some criticisms of the books he read, but by exchanging emails and apologizing for the statement, the cost of criticism increased, and the right to criticize was invisibly deprived. Of course, this phenomenon is not limited to books, and it is placed throughout the In the film and television industry, criticism and malicious slander are completely different things. The act of hitting the stars without watching the movie is malicious smears, not film criticism. It can also be further analyzed from the perspective of script, actors, scenes, lighting, photography and editing. Movie. ?

This is a general criticism of the writing and flow, in no way a personal attack or a bad smear, the book and the movie are in different fields, but the critical environment for both is similar, criticizing the movie Viewers may also receive warning letters from lawyers asking them to delete comments and just talk about the latest, such as a certain movie file during the Spring Festival, which is posted on the official blog to collect viewing experience views to help us grow, and suggestions to make us Progress, the director himself also said that I also accept all the audience's criticisms of this film. The posture is correct, but the result is not decent.

The truth is the greatest positive energy, and the practice of not seeing the truth and the truth is negative energy. Film creators with an introspective spirit should survive criticism, whether it is humbly accepted or based on criticism. Rational refutation is a way to survive. Directly deleting criticism is a way to survive. The least smart way is to hide. It seems that as long as negative comments are eliminated, the movie will be different. This is true. The problem is that the relationship between movies and criticism should be a dialogue. In the end, the audience needs criticism, and more importantly, the world needs the voices of ordinary people. In fact, people have different opinions on movies. This is normal, personal Or movies, unknowingly, blindly implement this approach. The more this happens, the less we can give in, otherwise, the critical environment will only become more and more closed.

?