I wanted to buy a novice SLR, but later I didn't want to invest in that.

I majored in photography in college, and I think LZ may not know much about SLR. Let me give you some personal opinions, hoping to help you.

I want to ask LZ, what do you like when you buy a SLR? Most people should say: picture quality.

If I guess correctly, then I want to ask you if you know: SLR ≠ good picture quality?

To tell the truth: almost all the configurations listed upstairs are the most dog configurations, not the fuselage, and the main problem lies in the lens.

The above lens 18- 105 is slightly better, but it is also a dog's head. Because it is impossible to use F8 forever, no matter which fuselage these dog heads are installed on, they are basically painted slag.

The biggest disadvantage of SLR is that it is too heavy and cumbersome, and it is very tiring to travel.

So what's the point of buying these configurations? It's just a lump of slag.

I think dumbbells are more affordable, cheaper and more efficient.

2. Take another example, the one beside me. When I was in college, many classmates, friends and relatives would buy SLR. Most of them, like LZ, bought the fuselage+18-55 or 18- 135. The most tragic thing is to buy 18-200 and 18-300.

SLR is bought, so they take it with them every time they go out to play, but soon, they find that SLR is not a matter of clicking the shutter at all, and many parameters don't know what it means at all. The photos they took were either all white or all black, blurred or unable to press the shutter. Finally, they hung the SLR around their necks and took photos with their mobile phones. In less than a month, the SLR was completely hidden in the bookcase.

If you haven't studied photography and have no time to study, please stay away from SLR, which is a waste of money and not good for buying things for your family.

My pure guess is that if LZ knows photography, then I don't think he will ask the above questions.

To sum up, LZ bought a camera.

The first thing to consider is whether to buy a SLR or a micro-single (SLR ≠ image quality is good, and many micro-single performances are far above the above SLR).

If it is purely a souvenir, take a group photo, absolutely micro-single, if you are sure to take a photo, then SLR.

Secondly, if you choose micro-order, according to your budget, you can consider NEX-5T and Fuji X 100S, both of which are very good.

Furthermore, if you choose a SLR, you decide to play photography.

Since you play photography, 1. The follow-up investment is absolute. I've never met a photographer who didn't follow up. Please meet two points when buying a SLR, otherwise the bookshelves will pile up quickly.

A the budget exceeds 9000 (parallel imports) or 1 10 00 (licensed products).

B. be good at photography or have time to toss about photography.

Finally, Japan also has business traps. Let's talk about what to choose when buying a SLR.

Let's start with the overall trend: As China people get richer, more and more amateur functions will be added to their professional SLR. Because the basic price remains unchanged, the professional performance (resolution, high sensitivity, feel, workmanship, continuous shooting focusing and calculation speed) will inevitably continue to improve, but the improvement speed will be slower. The extra money will be used to develop amateur functions (flip screen, built-in filter)

In addition to Canon:

Advantages: Canon's advantage lies in the telephoto lens and film market. Be good at new technology. The price of the top lens is graded, which is convenient for different objects to buy and adjust the image quality later.

Disadvantages: entry-level models are basically rubbish, and the mid-range has been eroded. 18-55, 18- 135 What's wrong? CMOS is not strong enough in theory, and the focusing system requires too much lens aperture.

So Canon 70D+ 15-85 is the first model.

Three-digit entry-level models have always been weak and unattractive, and the 6 0D mid-range positioning itself is not strong enough, and it has basically been eliminated.

Except Nikon:

Advantages: I insist on photography itself, and many Canon have no solid functions. Wide-angle image quality is one of its great advantages. The overall workmanship of the camera is acceptable, and the CMOS parameters are beautiful.

Disadvantages: the top lens is too expensive, and the fuselage motor is matched with the lens.

Therefore, Nikon d7xx+ 16-85 is the first model, with a minimum D5xx+ 16-85.

D3XXX and D5XXX are not recommended because of the positioning problem.

In addition, Pentax:

Pentax is more kind than C and N in the semi-market, especially the fuselage. Moreover, the lens is slightly German among many Nissan merchants.

But it doesn't have the whole picture, it's higher 120. In addition, the number of people who use Pentax is much less than that of CN, so if you will continue to invest, or want to play with a group of friends, it will be a sad drama.

Just like buying those custom sports cars, Pentax is like a manufacturer without top-notch equipment. You usually drive very well. If you want to upgrade, you can only sell cars and change factories.

Except Sony:

I wouldn't say SLR, just so-so. Micro-sheet is relatively successful. For example, the CMOS of NEX, in fact, many of them are CMOS used by Nikon and supplied by Sony. Remember NEX-6 and Nikon D7 100? Remember the same paragraph.

The main thing is that you can make high-performance gadgets very small, and most of the shots can be switched, so you don't have to worry about hitting the board at all, because there is no problem.

Better ones such as A7, A7R, Rx 1 are better than many high-end SLR.

More suitable for amateur travelers.

Except Fuji:

This is also the case, but it is also more powerful. Its appearance is basically more MAN, and the lens is mainly fixed focus. So the imaging is great, but there are certain requirements for the buyer base.

4. Accessories are mainly memory cards and UV. KENKO L37 UV can be considered for all the above lenses, and B+W or better is not required. Look at your model, most memory cards are SD, and the high-end ones will be CF. In short, it is right to buy a genuine high-speed card (for example, consider Sandisk 80M/S SD)

As for the camera bag, if it is a SLR, or that sentence, choose a SLR, either dusty or walking on the road of taking pictures. The former is self-sufficient and the latter is a backpack. If it is a small order, I don't think the bag is very important, but it is very light.

5. finally: in short, it may be more suitable to buy a micro-single NEX. To buy a SLR, the CN lens must be 15-85, 16-85, and the fuselage should be as mid-range as possible. The budget is not enough to choose Nikon.

Said a lot, always by hand. Personally, I am more practical. Please forgive me if I have offended you.