How to choose high pixel and high sense of SLR?

The pixels of SLR cameras have nothing to do with high sensitivity, but the grade of SLR cameras is closely related to high sensitivity. As we all know, the higher the grade, the better the high sensitivity.

When it comes to high sensitivity and high pixels, it is necessary to talk about the choice of camera. Many people still think that high-pixel cameras are awesome. The higher the better, that's what I thought when I didn't do photography before. This is completely wrong!

I believe many people have used old-fashioned mobile phones. The camera function of the old mobile phone is really poor, with low pixels. Most people think that pixels are good photos. The higher the pixel, the better it looks ... this is not the case. Whether a photo looks good or not has nothing to do with pixels. According to the current words, high image quality does not mean high pixels! The higher the pixel, the more colors, suitable for making all kinds of enlarged photos!

What is a high sense? High sensitivity is actually sensitivity, not the higher the sensitivity, the better the image quality. Sensitivity is just a camera setting that brightens the exposure of photos! Now the camera can't move tens of thousands of ISO, which is the sense of advanced! The higher the sense of height, the higher the sense of height can be. In fact, it's only a few thousand at most. I really don't need tens of thousands of ISO!

In general, it doesn't make much sense to see a high sensitivity of several hundred to twelve thousand. The higher, the worse. If the main body has a good noise reduction ability for high sensitivity, then this machine is a relatively good machine and worth buying! As for the pixel height, hehe, just look, there is no need to take it seriously!

Hello, once, high pixels and high sensitivity were contradictory, but the pixels of 20 19 and high sensitivity models were not bad. Of course, the high sensitivity of high-pixel models also has good usability.

After all, it's too small.

Specifically, how to choose 20 19, high sensitivity and high pixels?

Let me tell you my opinion:

First, in fact, this problem is really not a problem.

Why? Because the question now is actually how to choose between snapshot performance and high pixel.

Second, Nikon D850, Nikon Z7, Sony A7R3, Sony A7R4, in fact, the capture performance is also good, right?

Continuous shooting speed, autofocus.

As long as you are not obsessed with sports photography and bird photography, it should be said that it is enough to deal with most shooting subjects.

3. If you are really obsessed with sports photography and bird photography, what do you say?

1, yes, it seems that Sony A7R4 can also continuous shooting 10 seconds!

2. But as far as the current SD card is concerned, it can't meet the uninterrupted 10 second continuous shooting of Sony A7R4.

3. However, judging from the current press releases and network communication, the high pixel of Sony A7R4 is actually a trouble for timely and fast press releases.

4. As far as the current sd card is concerned, after shooting by Sony A7R4, the speed of film selection in the later stage is also slow.

5. As far as Sony A7R4 is concerned, ISO3200 or above can never be compared with Nikon D5 Canon 1DX.

Fourth, in fact, at any time, sports photography and bird photography are minorities.

It's not that you can't afford the fuselage, but you may not be able to afford the lens.

It's not that I have no money, but that I may be in poor health.

It's not that you don't care about money, but that you can't waste time.

To sum up, if you really take photos with sports photography or birds, then you must still be the top sports body.

It's just that most people can't.

So actually Nikon D850, Nikon Z7, Sony A7R3 and Sony A7R4 are enough.

To say the least, for most people, Sony A7M3 and Canon 5D4 are more than enough.

It's nonsense to talk about pixels without cmos size and ISO without shutter aperture.

Graduated from optics,

The larger the CMOS is, the better the imaging is, the more information is saved, and the less the interference of Ellie circle class appears.

CMOS with the same size has 20 million pixels and 50 million pixels, and there is little difference.

The 20 million pixels of APS-C are very different from the 50 million pixels of Quan Huafu.

There is little difference between Quan Huafu's 50 million and Quan Huafu's 1 billion.

If your senses are high, you don't need to look at the higher ISO, the better. What do you think? I'll give you the simplest way.

Same lens, same focal length, same illuminance, same focal length, same aperture, same ISO, same object.

The faster the shutter, the better the camera. For example, the shutter of Canon's entry camera is 1/60 seconds. In this case, 5d4 should be1120 seconds. If it is the top level of Hasselblad, it should be 1/320 seconds. High sense has nothing to do with the quality of the camera. . What about ISO 65438+ Million? I don't need it at all . All right. . . . That's all.

Inverse ratio, choose the balance point.

The higher the pixel, the worse the performance at high ISO!

For example, if you take 1200w a7s3 to shoot or video in the dark, it is simply evil night vision equipment.

Of course, that's just an extreme situation. In fact, as long as the pixel exceeds 2400w, it can basically reach the working standard, and the high pixel brings too much pressure to the later storage.

Exception: When taking landscape photos or business photos, you need a high-pixel camera if you want to enlarge and print it into a huge poster later. However, if you want a high-pixel camera in poor light, you can only press ISO to lower the shutter as much as possible.

Money, of course, both. If it is home, after shooting a circle of friends, then the high pixel is a display, pure traffic. Higher feelings are more useful.

My personal choice of high judgment.

If you don't do commercial photography, if you want to spray paint, you must choose a high sense.

Irrelevant