Why Canon and Nikon SLR Bisogni are good? Sony G lens and Zeiss head are recognized as the best heads, and CMOS Sony has core technology. Why?

There is no such thing as "the SLR Bisogni of Canon and Nikon is good"! I don't know where you heard it! It can only be said that Canon and Nikon Bisogni entered the SLR field earlier, but early entry is not necessarily better than late entry! In fact, Sony's SLR business was acquired from Konica Minolta, which is also a well-known camera manufacturer with a long history! -So we can only say that Sony brand SLR has no history of Canon Nikon, but the machine itself is not later than Canon Nikon, you know! !

Since SLR entered the digital age, the number of photographers seems to have suddenly increased, like mushrooms after rain. /kloc-when I took EOS5 to the park to shoot lotus flowers 0/5 years ago, everyone around me basically knew each other, and the circle was so big that there were only a few people. Nowadays, no matter what kind of people are carrying SLR, sometimes it's funny to see them holding SLR! ! Fighting in circles is like a big forest. There are all kinds of birds, and it is inevitable that there will be all kinds of powder and control. These people's evaluation of the machine can basically be regarded as noise! Because they know nothing but Canon Nikon, some people who take the words of those who are willing to talk about Kan Kan but are nothing as imperial edict really believe them!

On the other hand, Sony's brand appeared too late in the SLR field, and Canon Nikon's preconceived ideas also provided a hint for most novice photographers, because most novice photographers are brand-oriented (as BMW Mercedes-Benz has heard since childhood, so Lexus Acura is always considered to be worse than BMW Mercedes-Benz no matter how high its technical level is)!

As for what you said, Sony G lens is recognized as the best, I beg to differ. There are several Sony G lenses, but its lens group is still too few classics compared with Nikon Canon's classic lenses! !

Sony's technology is absolutely ahead of Canon Nikon in the original image. Many Nikon (SLR) and Canon (card machine) still use Sony's CCD. Canon has only CMOS, but no CCD technology. Nikon has been unable to make the original image for a long time after entering the digital age, resulting in his flagship SLR having to use Sony's original image (improved in recent years, but the output is not good)!

Single-lens reflex camera. Compared with Nikon and Canon, Sony is not only famous in the field of SLR, but also the main reason is that the scale of lens group is far from Canon and Nikon, and the photographers who played from film in the early days were basically Nikon and Canon's machines, and the lenses in their hands were also owned by these two companies. It is impossible to leave these lenses as novices to experience the products! Then these people influenced the next wave of people who entered the circle, generation after generation, again and again! So the situation of Sony SLR today is inevitable. If there is no once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, I dare to assert that it is difficult to turn over (it is my expectation that Sony will enter the SLR field, which is in line with Sony's consistent style, but why is Sony not as big and strong as Panasonic? Sony always seems to be fighting for breath, regardless of the consequences. However, after the introduction of L 1 and L 10 SLR models, the wily Panasonic found that it was impossible to leave decisively and established a new concept of single camera. Now it has made great achievements, and the Panasonic it manages is really not built. In short, Sony always gives me a tragic impression-experimental mice are really. !