Is it better for novice photographers (students, female) to use Canon 550D or Nikon D3 100? I hope to give a comparative evaluation and comment from the aspects of cost performance, function and quali

Is it better for novice photographers (students, female) to use Canon 550D or Nikon D3 100? I hope to give a comparative evaluation and comment from the aspects of cost performance, function and quality. Compared with the two, Nikon D3 100 has a lower positioning than Canon 550D, and naturally there are some gaps, mainly including:

550D has180,000 pixels, while D3 100 has only142,000 pixels. Don't listen to the popular theory that high pixels are useless. In addition to being more delicate at the same size, high pixels are also convenient to cut. The 550D has a very mature camera function, but Nikon can't reach this level at present. Canon's ergonomic design is more reasonable, and the handle of the same level fuselage is more comfortable than Nikon; 550D supports Canon's full range of EF lenses, but D3 100 can only be used for Nikon lenses with AF-S, and AF cannot focus automatically.

But it is true that Nikon's fuselage workmanship is slightly better than Canon's, and the quality of the hood is slightly better than Canon's, and of course the price is cheaper.

Quality is generally not an issue. But many of Nikon's machines are not made in Japan, but factories in Thailand and Indonesia. It is best to choose Japanese products with strict quality control. What Canon is seeing now seems to be made in Japan.

Personally, I think Canon still has great advantages in the entry fuselage, after all, it is positioned in the high half.

An entry-level SLR can use at least 50,000 shutter lives. Amateur users can always take photos for 4-5 years if they are not used destructively. Most entry-level SLR users will not wear it out, but will get bored. So don't worry about life.

Lens selection:

The most suitable lenses for getting into the fuselage are Canon 15-85 and Nikon 16-85. If you can afford it, you should choose it first. Secondly, we can choose Longteng B005 17-50/2.8. Although it is not the original factory, it has a large aperture and good imaging quality, which meets the requirements of "practicality" and "high cost performance". If you are not satisfied, use the cheapest lens 18-55 first. This lens is not bad compared with 18- 105, 18- 135, 18-200, and the price is higher in some places.

Don't have a headache. In short, start with the SLR. After being familiar with what SLR is all about, choosing equipment becomes a happy worry. Of course, now I'm confused.

Due to two good words about 550D, the rumors about Canon on the Internet in recent years have gathered under this problem. . Well, refute it at once.

The argument of littering the years is basically objective. There is little difference between input c and input n, but it is also true that the 550D camera is more powerful than the D3 100 camera alone. After all, the price is there. Where is the specific strength? I've already said it, so I won't repeat it.

Ignorance of stars is a typical prejudice. The predecessor of Canon's camera department is the Institute of Seiki Optics of 1933. Although it didn't start as early as Nikon, it won't last for decades. Canon and Nikon are both good at winning in the SLR field, so there is really no need to fight to the death. But I don't know your new registration ID, just answer one question, is it insinuating who is the trustee and who is the person who "asks himself and answers himself"?

Although wildcry's suggestion hits the nail on the head, unfortunately, it is based on prejudice. First of all, the product quality of an enterprise has nothing to do with its advertising strategy. It is too arbitrary to judge that the product is not good just because there are too many advertisements. As for the so-called Canon Soft Nikon Sharp, Canon looks like Nikon. I don't know how many years ago it was the old imperial calendar. In the digital age, the two products are highly similar and basically have no essential difference.

Finally, Mr. Red Hand's "Although Canon 550D has a body motor" fully exposed your ignorance of the camera industry. Canon has always focused on lens motors, and there has never been such a thing as a "body motor". Since I don't understand, I'd better praise and criticize less.

Students who don't leave their names on the first floor have short but basically reliable answers. If the landlord doesn't like my long speech, I might as well choose him.

Who said that "the entry machine is not worth changing the lens"? . SLR is an optical system, the optical core is the lens, and the fuselage is only the electronic accessories of the lens (just a black box in the film age). Moreover, there is no difference between the low-end body sensor of SLR and the high-end body, mainly in operation, workmanship and feel. So of course, good shots are important. Ideally, the investment ratio of lens and fuselage should be 6: 4 or even 7: 3. In the case of limited economic conditions, try to let the fuselage give way to the camera. In terms of lens group, Canon Nikon has some good heads, but don't worry too much about scalability.

D3 100 is cheaper than 550D 1000 or so. The main differences are some functional indicators: pixels, camera performance, LCD screen and continuous shooting speed. Whether to pay 1000 yuan for these depends on your own economic conditions and needs. There is no problem that Nikon is cheap or bad or Canon is good and cheap. The most appropriate way is to go to the experience store and touch the real machine yourself to see which one is more interesting.

The 230,000-pixel LCD screen looks bad on the camera, but it doesn't affect the effect on the computer.