Is it necessary for the elderly to buy a macro lens when they retire to play SLR?

It is necessary for the elderly to buy a macro lens. You can shoot stamens without cutting flowers. You can shoot creative water droplets and small insects at home. This lens is very suitable for the elderly, and it makes the four-dimensional imagination more colorful without going out to shoot a big movie.

The answer is: absolutely!

As far as my practice is concerned, the macro lens I use is Canon Budweiser II, and my experience is that the macro lens is a universal lens, which has the feeling of "walking the world with one mirror"! It is by no means what some experts say-shooting tiny objects at close range. Here are two sets of landscape photos. The lens is Canon Budweiser II with apertures of 4, 8 and 32 respectively.

It is no problem for the elderly to play SLR after retirement, which can not only enrich their colorful life after retirement, but also get exercise and happiness in shooting. Therefore, I support the elderly to play with SLR cameras.

Support the elderly to play SLR cameras, and do not support the elderly to buy macro lenses.

Macro lens, as its name implies, is a lens used for macro photography, which is mainly used to shoot subtle objects, such as bees, butterflies and flowers. Although the macro lens can be scaled according to the specific situation, it is not always time-consuming and laborious to shoot fine things, especially moving insects. Therefore, I don't support the elderly to buy macro lenses.

So, what lens should the elderly use to play SLR? My suggestions are: first, just for fun, don't want to spend more money. I can buy a 28- 105 mm zoom lens, which is not expensive and convenient for the elderly to take pictures. Second, the economic conditions are well-off, the money is not bad, and I want to take high-quality photos, so I buy "big three yuan" directly. At present, the "Big Ternary" lenses are very light except those of 70-200 mm, which is very suitable for the elderly.

It doesn't matter what you buy, it's important to enjoy it in the process. I used D5000 to match the cherry blossoms, tulips, February orchids, rape blossoms and Xifu begonia taken by Sima 105.

This is also my initial experience in the use of photographic equipment, please criticize and guide your teachers and friends!

Suitability mainly depends on one's own conditions, one is economic ability, the other is development direction, and the third is physical condition.

I think it's very suitable for the elderly to retire and take macro shots. If individuals have this preference, so much the better!

Personal reasons are as follows:

1, the macro lens is relatively light and small. As far as the current macro lenses are concerned, most of them are portable, and miniaturization and portability are more suitable for the elderly to play photography. Just like shooting a bird with a hundred kinds of fixed focus, it can't keep up physically.

Nikon 105 macro should be the best macro in Nikon's family. It looks brisk, how suitable for the elderly? !

2. The shooting environment is more suitable for the elderly. You can shoot scenery and birds. It's ok to see the scenery. If you travel with more than ten kilograms of photographic equipment, let alone the elderly, it is estimated that it is not easy for young people, but it is different to play far away. You can enjoy yourself in the shade of the park, a few small flowers or even a few ornaments at home, or you can drink tea and smoke. It is completely easy to play, and it is also very suitable for the elderly to entertain themselves.

In addition to macro, the focal area of macro lens can also shoot portraits and flowers, which has many uses.

To tell the truth, the elderly are a little tired of catching birds with the wind, haha.

I think most people will give you advice on buying a macro lens. It is a good choice for people who like photography to take pictures of flowers and plants after retirement. First, it's fun to shoot macro, and second, it can kill time.

There is a saying in the photography circle that macro has no weakness. Macro lenses from various manufacturers are excellent, and domestic macro lenses have only been listed in recent years. The magnification can reach 2 to 1, and the imaging quality is quite good and the price is relatively cheap.

There are many subjects for macro shooting, such as flowers, insects, ice window grilles in northern winter, etc.

Is it necessary for the elderly to buy a macro lens when they retire to play SLR? I think macro photography is more suitable for some elderly people. First, the lens is light and easy to carry, which has some advantages over those long guns and cannons. Second, you don't need to climb mountains to take macro shots. Community parks, strange rivers and streams can be used, and satisfactory works can also be made. Third, the main purpose of photography for the elderly is to keep fit and enrich their cultural life. Not only can you make many like-minded friends to learn skills and exchange experiences, but you can also go out for an internship every day. It pays to be happy, doesn't it?