Sony nex5 and Panasonic gf2

These two models are micro-single (also called single-electric) cameras. The specific principle will not be explained. .

In terms of image quality, NEX5 is better than GF2, because the APS-C frame of NEX5 is much larger than the M4/3 frame of GF2.

As for the lens problem, they can all change the lens. At present, the lens group of NEX5 is very weak, only three, and GF2 can be used for the lens group of the whole M4/3 system, so GF2 is better than NEX5 in terms of lens.

Both LCD screens are touch screens. The LCD screen of NEX5 is flip, with higher pixels, which is more convenient than GF2.

However, the control sense of NEX is very poor, and many parameters need to be adjusted in the secondary menu. At this point, GF2 completely defeated NEX5.

The appearance of GF2 is better, and the design of NEX5, with all due respect, is really unsightly.

In terms of playability, it's even. Both machines can shoot high-definition videos. These two machines can transfer almost all lenses of other bayonet systems (any Nikon Canon Leica lens can be connected to these two machines through an adapter ring, of course, manual focusing), and NEX5 can also realize automatic focusing when transferring Sony's own alpha interface lens.

Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and we can't say which is better than which. NEX5 is of course the best, but how many ordinary people who use the card machine can tell the difference in image quality between the two machines? And GF2' s sense of control can also make you feel much more comfortable when taking pictures.

Choosing a camera means choosing to be comfortable and feel good, rather than blindly pursuing "stronger". Although these two machines are really not as good as the strongest one. S.GF2 is not on the market yet.

Don't talk nonsense upstairs. The lens of LX3 is Leica-certified +asph coating, but none of the lenses of M4/3 system is Leica-certified. If you insist, Sony still has many Zeiss-certified lenses. )