Xeon E3- 123 1v3 Upgrade r5 3700?

If it is multi-core, the performance of Xeon 123 1v3 upgraded to Ruilong 1700 will be improved by more than two times, and even the performance of single core will be improved by 10%-20%. After all, the upgrade of memory bandwidth from DDR3 platform to DDR4 platform cannot be ignored. However, the overall performance of the third generation Ruilong 3700X is at least 30% stronger than that of Ruilong 1700. Including the upgrade of IPC and higher frequency memory, Ruilong 3700X is about three times that of 123 1v3.

Although we say that Intel's CPU is more suitable for playing games, CPU 123 1v3 is an old architecture many years ago, and even if it is more efficient, it can't keep up with AMD's zen architecture Ryzen processor. Many games I play with 1230v2 are often unstable, but they become smooth after changing with Ruilong 1700. The brand-new architecture and the high bandwidth of DDR4 memory are indispensable. If you render graphics and videos, the Ruilong 3700 ratio 123 1v3 can save two-thirds of the time.

If you just play games, Ruilong 3700 can give full play to the performance of high-end graphics cards, and 123 1v3 can also be matched with GTX 1060. No matter how high the performance of the graphics card is, it will be wasted, so I think it is worthwhile to upgrade from 123 1v3 to Ruilong 3700.

First of all, the statement on this issue is wrong. First, this 123 1 belongs to the Intel platform, so it is impossible to directly use the 3700 processor by upgrading. In addition, the 3700 model has never been seen in the market, and it is basically 3700X. You should know that this 3700X belongs to the AMD platform, and it is completely two processors that cannot be used together. Secondly, this 3700x belongs to the R7 series of the third generation of Ruilong, not R5, not a grade at all. From the positioning point of view, this 123 1v3 belongs to the mid-range server processor, while R7 3700x belongs to the high-end processor of Ruilong, which is almost the same level as Intel i7. So as soon as I saw this question, I knew that the subject didn't understand computer hardware. This computer hardware cannot be used on different platforms and interfaces, and only the same platform and interface can support the upgrade.

If the subject wants to use 3700x, it is necessary to replace the whole computer, regardless of the CPU motherboard memory, which is not a small price. If there is still a big performance gap between them, 123 1v3 belongs to the fourth generation Intel platform interface 1 150, then Xeon E3 123 1V3. Let's talk about this problem.

If the subject wants to use 3700x, it is necessary to replace the whole computer, regardless of the CPU motherboard memory, which is not a small price. If there is still a big performance gap between the two, 123 1v3 belongs to the fourth generation Intel platform, and its interface is 1 150, with 22nm four cores and eight threads, the main frequency is 3.4GHZ, and the core can reach 3. It supports DDR3 1333 1600, the maximum frequency is 32g, and the power consumption is 80W, while 3700X belongs to Ruilong 3rd generation. It adopts am4 interface, the maximum dynamic frequency is 3.6GHZ to 4.4GHZ, and the manufacturing process is 7 nm, with 4mb secondary buffering and 32MB tertiary buffering. eight nuclear 16. Compared with the parameters, 3700x is several times stronger than 123 1v3, and it is not a class processor. It is meaningless to compare them together. I happen to have two sets of running charts of Master Lu's 3700x and 123 1v3, and you will know at a glance.

The first is a set of 3700x running scores:

Another group E3 123 1V3 ran off:

You can see that there is no better 3700x than 123 1v3. In addition, the fourth-generation platform itself is limited to supporting 1600 memory. How can it compare with the 3700x that supports 4000+? No matter the number of cores or threads, the manufacturing process and main frequency are completely crushed by 123 1v3. Therefore, the comparison between 3700x and 123 1V3 is not only improved a little, but also improved by at least 2 times. So it is meaningless to say that things that are not in the same grade should not be put together. It's like how you compare a submachine gun with someone else's missile. It's not the same level at all. The target of 3700x should be Intel 9700K or 10700k processor, not outdated server CPU 123 1v3. In addition, you should know that using 3700x means reinstalling the computer, and the original accessories are basically useless. If this fourth-generation platform is upgraded to 4790k, it will be used in the end. I don't know if my friend agrees with me.

Let's take a brief look at the parameters E3 123 1V3. The product with 4 cores and 8 threads is clocked at 3.4GHZ, and Ruilong seems to have no R5 3700. At present, it only has R7 3700X, clocked at 3.6GHZ, with a turbo frequency of 4.4GHZ and 8 cores 16 threads.

E3 123 1V3 is the fourth generation i7490k product of Intel. At present, Intel has reached the i7 9 series, and there are at least three generations of i7 6700K, 7700K and 8700K products in the middle. That is to say, there is a gap of at least four generations from the nearest i7 9700K. It is conservatively estimated that the performance of each generation will increase by 5% at the same frequency. Then, the performance improvement is 2 1%, and counting the main frequency difference, the single-core performance is improved by 40% with the highest frequency, 4.4/3.8= 1. 158, which is about 16%. So the single core is at least 40% higher. Needless to say, there are at least four more physical cores, and the core frequency of the whole core can reach at least 3700X GHz, and the performance is improved by at least two times.

Moreover, the bandwidth advantage brought by better memory, the interface of the new motherboard and the advantages of the supported SSD are not considered. In a word, the result is a great improvement, the performance of single core is improved by more than 40%, and the performance of multi-core and peripheral devices is improved by more than 200%.

The 2600k I am using is basically at the same level as your U, and now I have 16g memory. The graphics card is changed once a year and a half, and the cpu is changed again on the same day. Otherwise, the investment is too large and the promotion feeling is not great.

I suggest not changing it, because the contrast is greatly improved. It took me three months to change my e3 to 3700x, and it doesn't make any difference to play games with graphics card 1080ti, really. Just sold the 3700x mainframe for a few days. The E3 of 580 continues to play for several years, and the picture quality of 1k is no different. The extra money is simply not worth it. Unless you use 2k4k to render food.

As long as it is enough, the key to playing games is the graphics card. E3 123 1v3 has good performance, which is equivalent to 4770 and superior to r5 1500x. I think it will last five years.

I just upgraded from x570 123 1v3, Gigabyte b85,750ti, 16G to 3700x, x570,65438+750ti, 64G, with video retouching, and the effect is much better.

Look at your configuration and you will know that the graphics card has been changed, and it can't be too long. If you want to change U this time, it means changing everything except the graphics card. If you just play games, you won't feel much difference without changing the graphics card. Besides, with your current configuration, there should be nothing you can't afford to run. What have you changed? Wait until the technology of ddr5 and 5nm is upgraded.

You're not changing CPU, are you? The whole platform Of course, the performance of the motherboard memory is solid. Here's the thing. It's the whole computer.