I just saw netizens say that Canon 650D with Canon 18- 135 lens is more cost-effective than Canon 60D. Is it enough for beginners of pure photography to use and travel daily?

The first thing that can't be confused is that the performance of the fuselage can't be compared with the practicality of the lens. Canon's two-digit series is definitely higher than the three-digit series, including all aspects of performance, such as manual exposure controllable parameters, iOS range, shutter speed, imaging quality of photosensitive elements, autofocus point distribution and so on.

Secondly, the practicality of the lens is often based on the premise of sacrificing the quality of optical imaging to a certain extent. Simply put, it is a lens with the same lens quality. The wider the focal length, the lower the imaging quality. This involves some basic optical principles of the lens. You can check it.

So when you choose a camera, you should consider it comprehensively. To get started, 650D with 18- 135 is enough. If you plan to advance in the future, it is also necessary to equip the 60D with some fixed-focus lenses, such as 50mm, 85mm and 200mm, which are suitable for different subjects. Fixed focal length imaging is much better than wide focal length imaging, and of course the capital investment is correspondingly higher.