6D2VS5D4, which is better?

Comparing these two machines, it is obvious that 5d4 has absolute advantages, and it is not the same level as 6d2 at all. Although the 6d series is a Quan Huafu SLR model with high performance-to-price ratio, compared with the 5d series, it has inherent shortcomings in many aspects.

What are the advantages of 5d4 over 6d2?

1, the overall design of the fuselage is more professional.

In Canon SLR series, 5d4 is designated as a quasi-professional model after 1dx series, while 6d2 is also called quasi-professional model, but it is more oriented to home design. The main body of 5d4 fuselage is made of metal, while 6d2 is full plastic machine. 5d4 has a rocker-type focus selection design, while 6d2 does not. 5d4 has dual memory card slot design, which can use faster cf cards, while 6d2 only has sd single card slot design. The shoulder screen of 5d4 showed more comprehensive information, and 6d2 was castrated. 5d4 is dustproof and drip-proof, and 6d2 is much weaker. 5d4 has many shortcut keys, which can switch functions more quickly, while 6d2 has some functions that need to be set in the menu.

2, the performance index is more powerful.

5d4 has stronger performance index than 6d2, so it is easier to use. First of all, 5d4 has a more powerful phase focusing system, with more focus points, more cross focus points, stronger focusing accuracy and wider focusing coverage, while 6d2 still relies more on center focus points than its contemporaries, and the rest of the focusing accuracy is poor. The performance of 5d4 continuous shooting is better, and it can shoot 7 shots per second in continuous focus, but 6d2 should not hope for such an operation. Although we can also focus on continuous shooting, the success rate will be greatly reduced. The maximum shutter speed of 5d4 is 1/8000 seconds, and you can still shoot with a large aperture lens under strong light, but the maximum shutter speed of 6d2 is limited in this respect.

3, the picture quality has the advantages of tolerance and resolution.

5d4' s 30-megapixel Quan Huafu cmos performs well in Canon's sensors, with relatively balanced low sensitivity, relatively good high sensitivity, more accurate color reproduction and excellent tolerance performance in its own sensors. However, the resolution of 6d2 sensor is slightly lower at first, and there is a certain gap between 20 million pixels and 5d4. The most important thing is its poor tolerance. It is recognized as a low tolerance sensor. If the film needs to be repaired later, this sensor can be said to be inappropriate. The advantage of 6d2 sensor is high sensitivity, and its high sensitivity performance is even better than that of 5d4, but its low sensitivity purity is worse.

The subject has a clear demand for photography, that is, sports photography and starry sky photography. Sports photography requires high focusing and chasing, as well as continuous shooting speed. Starry photography requires high sensitivity and tolerance of the camera. Based on the above analysis, it is obvious that 5d4 is more suitable, the focusing system is obviously better than 6d2, and the tolerance is much better than 6d2. Although 6d2 has a better sense of height, 5d4 is more balanced, so shooting the starry sky theme must be revised later. Therefore, if the subject chooses between these two cameras, it is necessary to choose 5d4 according to the use requirements, and 6d2 is not enough for the subject.

You have no painting skills, no shooting experience, and no later retouching experience. 10 years is enough for you to play 6D2. Even if 5D5 comes out, it will pay a very high price. 5D4 decreased to about 1w4. I want to reduce the price again, unless 5D5 comes out to buy two mobile phones, but 5D4 is good. I prefer 6D2. After all, it is convenient to flip the screen. I really don't want to pat my stomach if I can squat. I took this with a film camera. Actually, the most important thing is the head behind the camera.

6D2VS5D4, which is better?

Want to start with a Canon Quan Huafu SLR, mainly used for shooting sports and starry sky! Which is better and more cost-effective to start with 6D2 or 5D4? (I'm a photographer)

Sports lens, 70-200mm 2.8mm.

Starry lens, 16-35mmF2.8

In view of your specific problems, my analysis and suggestions are as follows:

First, if you are a professional photographer and earn money by working, you definitely need 5D4.

6D2 can only be used as backup machine and auxiliary machine at most, or in some counties.

Second, if you are not a professional photographer, there is really no need to buy 5D4.

Photography enthusiasts, home users and self-media users really don't recommend 5D4.

Third, I don't know what kind of sports you are talking about.

1, if it's really a difficult sport, it's still 1DX series or 90D. And must be equipped with a professional telephoto lens.

2, if only half of the sports, or primary and secondary school sports meeting is this level, rather than a national sports competition. Then in fact, 200D can also be used, and there is no problem, but the success rate is slightly worse.

If it is the level of the primary and secondary school sports meeting, in fact, 6D2 is completely enough.

However, EOS RP/R is a bit insufficient.

Fourth, I don't know whether you are talking about starry sky photography or specializing in starry sky photography.

In fact, starry sky photography has no artistic content, and most of the starry sky photography works are just photos of technical flow or equipment parties, which is meaningless.

If you are photographing the starry orbit of the landmark buildings around you, or you say that you want to specialize in starry photography … this is different.

Generally speaking, it is ok to shoot the starry sky with Huawei mobile phone.

Unless you specialize in this, or you are determined to shoot the star track of landmark buildings or characteristic scenery in your hometown to the extent that the Propaganda Department of the Municipal Party Committee can choose, it is not recommended that you spend money to shoot stars.

6. For photographers, 6D2 is really enough, whether it's primary and secondary school sports meeting or starry sky photography.

The main problem is the lens.

70-200mmF2.8, basic motion lens, more expensive than 6D2.

16-35mmF2.8 is also a basic starry camera lens and is more expensive than 6D2.

6. Due to the high price of digital micro-lens, 6D2 has become the most cost-effective choice.

Sony's 70-200mmF2.8 and 16-35mmF2.8 are much more expensive than Canon's, aren't they?

Canon micro-single, is it more expensive than Canon SLR?

To sum up, from the perspective of cost performance, you may only buy Canon 6D2, but it should be noted that the lens you need to buy is really not cheap, please consider it comprehensively.

To tell a common sense, they are all passenger cars, with hundreds of thousands of cars and hundreds of thousands of cars. Even people who don't understand cars, even if they don't look at the configuration and performance of cars, don't hesitate to say that hundreds of thousands of cars are better than hundreds of thousands of cars.

Therefore, the expensive SLR 5D4 is naturally better.

If the car buyer says that only one ride condition can be met, hundreds of thousands of cars can only take five people.

Therefore, the cheap SLR 6D2 is naturally more cost-effective.

If you can afford the budget of 5D4, to say which sports and starry sky have better shooting performance, of course, it is 5D4. You didn't say shopping was not cost-effective. Better performance means better performance. It's just that after buying 5D4, the configuration of some lenses in the back should be considered. It is impossible to shoot a sports theme without a telephoto lens of 10 thousand yuan. Of course, not only sports themes need good lenses, but also the starry sky needs good lenses. Otherwise, I'm very sorry for your 5D4.

If you say you are a photographer, it is too expensive to buy a more expensive SLR span and the cost is too high. In addition, choosing sports and starry sky shooting themes is very expensive if you want to shoot well!

How to compare?

Such as gold and platinum cards.

Is 5D4 imaging in full-pixel continuous shooting?

Are better than 6D2.

But if you compare the prices,

If you are rich, I suggest starting with 5D4.

If the funds are not plentiful, stick to 6D2.

Go out and shoot high-priced products

Personal suggestion 5D4 is more professional and convincing.

If you like to have fun.

6D2 fully meets your needs, and the contrast lens still accounts for some proportion.

Ok, the analysis and comparison of these two cameras is enough.

Thank you for your questions and suggestions.

Canon EOS 5 D Mark IV VS Canon EOS 6D Mark II Evaluation

Canon EOS 5D series can be said to be one of the most famous camera series in the digital age, and Mark IV aims to attract the same wide range of enthusiasts and professionals. Almost the same as the previous generation, it has undergone a lot of upgrades under the hood, including: high-resolution sensor with dual-pixel autofocus, 4K video shooting, upgraded autofocus system, touch screen, improved weather seal, built-in Wi- Fi/NFC, interval timer and GPS. All these add up to make the camera an option of Canon Quan Huafu, which is very suitable for Canon's product line.

It is based on a new 30.4MP CMOS sensor and uses a Digic 6+ processor. The autofocus system comes from the flagship 1D X Mark II. Compared with Mark III, it includes 6 1 autofocus points (of which 4 1 is cross-shaped), and the vertical coverage is expanded by 24%. The center point is sensitive to -3EV in single shot (AF-S) mode (in real-time display, the sensor is sensitive to -4EV in fast shot).

4K video shooting is a popular function of cameras, and users can record at 24 or 30p speed, although the cropping speed is 1.64 times. All the material is captured in motion JPEG format. In addition, the camera supports 4K frame capture, which can effectively provide users with 30 fps still image shooting of (dual-pixel) AF. We see that the shutter of the camera rolls a little, but it still has certain advantages when capturing 7fps is not enough to capture the decisive moment.

Canon said that when developing IV, it solicited feedback from users of 5D series, and found that dynamic range, resolution, autofocus accuracy and autofocus speed are the four areas that need to be improved most. Theoretically, Kyle IV seems to have solved these problems well.

Canon 5D Mark IV main specifications

In terms of autofocus, increasing coverage is an important part of the upgrade: after all, it is the same as the autofocus system used in the company's flagship sports camera. The RGB-IR photometric sensor with 150000 pixels borrowed the original 1D X, which provided scene information for the autofocus system, brought enhanced subject recognition (including face) and tracking ("iTR"), and improved photometry and flicker detection.

The 5D Mark IV is Canon's first full-frame camera, which can be continuously focused and displayed in real time during still photo shooting. Due to the working principle of dual-pixel autofocus, even with a fast lens, the focus is usually very accurate. Surprisingly, it can stick to the original theme (or face) that you initially paid attention to, and can easily specify the theme by clicking on the theme on the touch screen in the mode of "face first+tracking".

5D Mark IV also has some new technologies, including dual-pixel Raw, which is a good choice and can prove to be very useful in specific shooting scenes. It works by recording two 30-megapixel images, one for each pixel's "left eye" and one for each pixel's "right eye" photodiode. Canon used to combine these two signals at each pixel, but dual-pixel Raw gives you the option to separate them. The file generated in this way is twice the original size, but in the professional digital photo software provided by Canon, "image fine adjustment" and "lens offset" can be carried out to reduce ghosting.

superiority

disadvantaged

Canon EOS 6D Mark II full-frame digital SLR camera is aimed at advanced amateurs and amateurs, even professionals looking for the body of Canon's second-generation digital SLR camera. Its brand-new 26MP sensor has dual-pixel technology, which can achieve accurate autofocus in real-time viewfinder shooting, and the same 45-point autofocus system is obtained from EOS 80D, which is a cropping sensor for inductive viewfinder shooting. Complete hinged touch screen, built-in Wi-Fi and GPS functions and 6.5 fps continuous shooting function make the whole package more perfect.

It entered the market within five years after its predecessor was released. Not surprisingly, 6D Mark II is based on the original in almost all aspects. Resolution, autofocus performance, continuous shooting speed, video shooting and even battery life have all been improved.

In other words, five years is a long time in the digital camera market, and the competition has not stagnated. So the question remains: Is the progress of 6D Mark II big enough?

Key specification

The original EOS 6D and Nikon D600 pioneered the concept of "entry-level" full-frame cameras. A camera in which the real value of things lies in the size of the sensor and has a slightly reduced function set and a main body surrounding it.

Eo6d Mark II unabashedly followed in the footsteps of his predecessor. Its unique 26MP Quan Huafu sensor is wrapped in a fairly plastic (but still weatherproof) body. Compared with Quan Huafu's Canon kin, it can make some compromises-however, we should emphasize that it can be expected that compared with 5D Mark IV, its considerable discount is $65,438+0,300.

superiority

disadvantaged

It is no accident that Canon became the world's largest camera manufacturer. Through careful research, yes, through some market segments, it has found a way to sell many cameras that satisfy many people. However, the risk that it has been running recently is one of the stagnation States that people think. Although they continue to provide impressive high-end products, many competitors are still stepping up their pace to bring some products that consumers think are "annoying" in some form to the market.

Considering all this, EOS 6D Mark II is a classic Canon DSLR. Is it particularly exciting? No, but in fact, apart from the reasonable price, there is no original 6D. However, 6D Mark II is a sturdy and well-structured camera, which can produce excellent images and improve its predecessor in almost every measurable aspect.

Your question is a little tangled. Which machine is better? Of course, it is 5D4 released by Canon 20 16, but which one is more cost-effective? This is a question of price. In terms of price, of course, 6D2 is more cost-effective.

Your shooting also describes sports and starry sky, which requires two points. First, high-speed continuous shooting and precise focusing, so 6D2 can actually be competent for this theme, but shooting 6D2 in the starry sky can be sidelined, and the tolerance is not good. 5D4 is not so good, but it is better than 6D2.

Don't worry, 5D4 continuous shooting focusing can also meet the sports theme, but the price is more expensive than 6D2. Although this guy is a little old, the toothpaste factory just doesn't squeeze toothpaste. You choose Canon and can only recommend 5D4.

5D4 ranks first in comprehensive ability, of course it will be more expensive. After all, the machines in flagship machine recommended to buy 5D4, which was barely enough to pay 6D2.

Shooting the starry sky is different from other subjects, except that the fuselage is more inclusive and the noise reduction ability is stronger, and a large aperture lens is needed. Only when the sensitivity and tolerance of the camera are high, with a suitable large aperture lens, can we shoot excellent starry sky works, which is of course related to the scene environment.

If you are short of money, you can buy 6D2, and you can buy a large aperture lens to shoot two subjects, but you need to be careful not to pull the exposure and shadows. 6D2 will show you a lot of vertical noise and Canon features.

If the money is not bad, buy 5D4 in a down-to-earth manner. Although this guy is a little old, he can still shoot starry sports. Endurance is much stronger than 6D2, at least it won't make you cry when exposed, and comprehensive ability comes first.

5d4, of course. It inherits 5d3 and has many functions! 6d2 is just an entry-level Quan Huafu SLR.

As far as equipment performance is concerned, the two machines are not comparable, and 5D4 is not a little better. Choosing a camera depends on its own use, and 6D2 is also a very cost-effective device.

The fewer Canon camera models, the better the camera. Of course, 5D4 is better than 6D2.