50 1.8 lens or 55-250 lens, which is more useful? Which one has more functions? Which is cost-effective? Which usage rate is high? I gave a speech on the car model of the party.

50 1.8 is mainly used to shoot portraits, humanities, scenery, food, life records, etc.

55-250 is mainly used to shoot distant views and birds, and it is not easy to be found by taking candid photos on the street.

Both of them have their own positioning, and they can't say which is more useful. Depends on what you usually shoot.

Function: 50 is fixed focus, and you can't zoom when composing. You can only run before and after, and the aperture is blurred. 55 250 variable multiple zoom. There is no big aperture, but you can shoot people at close range and long distance.

The cost performance ratio is of course 50 1.8. There is no doubt about it.

Which usage rate can only depend on what you usually shoot. I often take portraits, more than 50. There must be more than 55,250 people who often pat birds. Of course, 55 250 is also used to shoot people, but blurring and imaging are not as good as 50.

For parties, it is more convenient to use a wide-angle lens. It is good to make a long-focused speech, because sometimes your seat may be in the back. Experts can use any lens to shoot car models. Fish-eye, wide angle and medium telephoto are all acceptable. Of course, a medium coke is often used.

Personally, I prefer 50 1.8. The good mind of the poor.