Why do artists always like to undress girls?

It's hard to write below. In fact, when I thought about this question a few days ago, as an outsider, it was difficult to understand the situation of the artists, and it was also difficult to feel the hardships and anxiety of the artists who broke the enough paper. I am willing to throw a brick to attract jade, and I would be grateful if I could get some advice from a reasonable person. It seems that from the earliest sculpture totem about ancient Greece and Rome, I was amazed at the charm of western civilization, the greatness of its humanistic factors and the roundness of its personal ideas. The contact between ancient eastern civilization and the west, and the slight differences can make people realize different understandings. There are always people who are full of books and like to comment on a painting. As an outsider, and I believe that for more than 99% of the world's population, the evolution of art is always accompanied by the evolution of human concepts, rather than being mysterious and pretentious as a few people. I believe that what is the universal value of art if it is only spread as a collection value by a few people who want to show their identity? However, back to the theme, there is a small question at first. Where did people's primitive worship of human body art begin? According to the appraisal of archaeological circles, the formation of human society started from matriarchal clan in the early stage, and then gradually developed into paternal clan-can this be used as a basis? Or do people take different forms to express different ideas? In addition to the role of the most basic primitive murals in recording people's lives, the earliest works of human body art can be found in the totem of primitive spirit, such as the stone man on Easter Island and the bronze statue of Sanxingdui. Looking back, there are differences when people begin to identify with themselves. Now, when western civilization spread to China, we can see its conflict. I only ask one question about this conflict:? It is difficult to understand Yu Congrong, an artist who is calm purely for art; Say it's not for art, but for what? Venus with a broken arm stood gracefully, and the ancient Greeks had their own understanding of the relationship between God and man. Because Zeus is the king of the gods, he can have all kinds of illegitimate children and illegitimate daughters, which historians and writers always describe with a little elegance. When Michelangelo showed the real magnificence of the human body during the Renaissance, many people suddenly realized: Oh, it turns out that science and art can coexist harmoniously. In this respect, we also know the fact that Leonardo da Vinci was a great man, and he also deserved those amazing works. Benefiting from the ideological dividend brought by the spiritual revolution, some people can simply answer the above questions, but they still can't convince me. Worship of human nature? Or can simple women have more lines and beautiful sparks as the best experiment and stepping stone for the art world to enter the room? Whatever you say. When we gradually began to love these things, we have put our male compatriots in an increasingly embarrassing position in art, using women in sketch and women in photography-and, in order to express extraordinary art, they must be naked. Therefore, in order to pursue artistic realm, people can use body art to beautify the natural environment and attract photographers from all directions to collect full registration fees, which is euphemistically called secluded valley. In order to pursue artistic realm, people can use body art to publicize the connotation of artistic works and confuse the public with artistic creation, which is the need of the plot. Does art advocate gender equality? Maybe the world is unequal, but it is equal on the whole, because people are always pursuing an equal realm. When God created Asia, he didn't think of making a dress until Eve appeared, and they didn't taste the forbidden fruit. Now we're just going back to basics. Well, I can understand that-but we are still unequal. Reasoning comes and goes, and I push myself into a strange circle. At present, the combination of China art world and traditional culture is pushing myself into a strange circle-no matter what art is, it is no different. Are we satisfying a selfish desire? Or is it a spiritual rape by artists through people's simple desire for art? Nowadays, when watching domestic movies, every department must take passionate dramas as gimmicks. As the equal sign between hidden rules and the future of performing arts becomes clearer and clearer, and artistic photography becomes more and more embarrassing, where will we go? I need to understand the wisdom of art, but I don't need the wisdom to understand these situations.