Is South Korea's photography technology world-class?

Of course, Korean photography is not first-class, and first-class photography should be in Europe and America.

This thing also mainly depends on aesthetics and public taste orientation.

In fact, in terms of production technology, Japan's production technology is more delicate than that of South Korea.

Many of Japan's photographic works have also absorbed the characteristics of Europe and America.

Every detail of European and American works, whether it is light, composition or color, has been carefully thought over. The so-called works are more detailed and the theme is very novel.

Some photographers in Japan travel between Europe, America and Japan. Conceptually, they are not as active as the United States, but they are willing to devote themselves to learning.

There is nothing creative in Korea, but others play with the rest, mainly imitating it better. Work on the details.

There is nothing to talk about in China. It's basically thick branches and rotten leaves. They didn't learn well and didn't do well. They only made two dollars by fooling around. Only a few works are quite tasteful, but they lack exquisiteness.

As for how many years behind, it is hard to say, mainly because there is a problem with the way of thinking. It is too impetuous to think hard for a work.

The backwardness of education and narrow-minded thinking lead to China's development in various fields.

You don't have to look at anything else. Just look at the scores of photography students every year. Go to college without getting two points.

Basically, there is no way out. Look at that teacher again. They are all fools.

If we have to judge by time, I think the level of China's photographic works can only reach the second-rate level of developed countries in the 1960s and 1970s.