How about Nikon 70-300mm f4-5.6 G?

There are long ones and short ones. There is no need to use this telephoto lens if it is only for daily use (not for obtaining any photographic works). To tell the truth, the performance of AF series telephoto lenses is not very high, and the high performance of the camera itself is often not played out because of the performance defects of the lens. As far as Oak Cannikin Law is concerned, how much water can be held depends on the shortest board. Now it seems that the AF series low-performance telephoto lens happens to be this board. This is the "compact performance" that our photographer pursues. If the landlord really likes to enjoy the power of capturing images at the telephoto end, then you should have a concept in mind: the price of a 300 mm telephoto lens ranges from several hundred to tens of thousands, and the price of the lens you choose should be equivalent to the price of the camera body. This is the minimum. If you don't have economic strength, you might as well use a 600 telephoto lens instead of giving up all the performance to meet the performance. The above is my little experience, hoping to help the landlord.