Nikon D750, 24- 120 takes pictures of the scenery. Is the lens of 16-35 suitable?

First of all, your machine is good. The lens is a common focal length of Nikon, but if you just play with the scenery, it is obvious that the 24mm wide angle is still a little worse.

According to your lens calculation, you should be short of funds for 16-35F4, because this 16-35 is not very expensive, so it is estimated that you are looking for a balance point, but if you really like landscape photography, a super wide-angle lens is a must-buy product.

On the whole, Nikon's 16-35 is not bad, with the same aperture and wide-angle dog. It's no problem to shoot big scenes, but in the long run, 14-24F2.8 is the best choice. It seems that spending more money is actually the most economical, and it is even more expensive without going back and forth.

Why not take off the ring of 24- 120 and give 14-24F2.8 some money, at least in this way, we don't have to worry that the lens is not wide enough, the aperture is not big enough and the picture quality is not good enough?

I really don't want to do this. Your compromise of 16-35 can only be barely enough.

Originality is not easy. Every time I like comments, they give me the greatest encouragement. There are still 990,000 1 10,000 fans. I hope you are the next iron powder. Please advise me if I am wrong. I hope my answer can help you. Thank you-