There is an urgent need for an argument that people are happier alive!

(1) We believe that the essence of living for oneself is to follow a reasonable egoistic lifestyle, and it is a value orientation that guides people to be reasonable and self-interested through altruism, which is by no means extreme egoism as the other debater said. If we can't put living for ourselves and living for others in the correct position of social ethics, there is no doubt that the argument will be unfair.

(2) Happiness comes from the realization of the subject of happiness-people's needs, ideals, values and right and wrong.

(3) The place near the water source is covered with grass, Tsinghua, Shui Mu; But far from the water source, the land is cracked and nothing grows. The criterion for us to judge which lifestyle is happier is undoubtedly who is closer to the source of happiness, that is, which lifestyle can better meet people's needs, ideals, values and the realization of right and wrong. Therefore, we believe that people will be happier if they live for themselves for the following reasons:

1. People who live for themselves will undoubtedly act according to their own values and views on right and wrong without harming the interests of others, and seek more personal ideals and beliefs to realize their self-worth, which is undoubtedly more in line with the standard of happiness. And worry about the world first, and then enjoy the world.

2. Live for others, both active and passive. It is possible to be happy if you take the initiative to live for others, but how can you be happy if you have to live for others because of their requirements or compulsion? Vasily, the first sniper of the Soviet Union in the movie Enemy at the Gates, was originally a person who loved quiet and leisurely life, but because of the needs of the Soviet Red Army and the government, he had to become a red flag on the stage of World War II. It has already surpassed the embodiment of his will and value, and has become an unbearable lightness in Vassili's life, which has almost caused him a fatal disaster. Can you be happy living for others like this?

This example only leads to the second argument. Since ancient times, loyalty and righteousness cannot be balanced, and living for others will inevitably violate personal values, right and wrong, and moral values at some point. This photographer, who was sent to a military court by the US government in "Broken Glass" for exposing the abuse of prisoners in the United States, did not hesitate to choose the latter when facing the interests of others and his correct sense of right and wrong and responsibility. He may be cast aside as a traitor to the nation, but it will always attract our applause abroad.

4. To live for others, first of all, it is difficult for others to distinguish between the just camp and the evil camp. It is difficult for people to adjust their views. Living for others can only make people fall into the quagmire of struggle and mediation, loyalty and betrayal, and Tao and righteousness. Where does happiness come from?

There are many peace-loving people. But one day the enemy set foot on their land, and they were forced to go to the battlefield without killing the enemy. Our people will be ravaged, but killing him goes against my kind nature. But I will not hesitate to kill him, but my heart died from the moment I raised the knife. When our rules of life are trampled, when our views on right and wrong are powerless, we will be like lost lambs, unable to find our spiritual home. And happiness will also lose the soil on which to live ...) (Can be changed to discuss reasonable egoism/guidance) After pacifying Fang La, Song Wu gradually drifted away and died alone; Faced with the dilemma between heaven and earth and George W. Zi Xuan, he had to choose anonymity to pursue his little happiness. But that's better than helping Kangxi put down the rebellion and then carrying a lifetime debt of conscience. There are so many charming heroes in the country, but are they happy? Oh, how can I seriously bow and scrape to those people with high status and important positions? They will never be seen with a sincere face. Am I unhappy? Life is precious, but love is more expensive. If you are free, you can throw them away. Thanksgiving Day has just passed, and I want to thank today's society for giving us the freedom to pursue our personal values.

We advocate living a happier life for ourselves. We advocate the values of reasonable egoism because it will make our society more harmonious, and because of it, the light of human nature will not go out, but will shine more brightly!

Those most beautiful flowers bloom for themselves, and those great souls live for faith! Thank you!

If you help others, you will be happy. If you don't do this, others may be unhappy. If others are happy, you will be happy. You will feel that your life is very meaningful and naturally feel happy and proud of your life.

No one should live for himself, realize his own value and realize his dreams. Our parents gave birth to us for no other reason than to hope that we will be happy and have a successful career. They gave birth to us not to let us do it for others, but to make us happy. In fact, no one lives for himself. Everything happened by itself. Those who say they live for others actually live for their own souls. After all, they live for themselves.

I insist on a positive view. People live in this world for themselves. People are selfish, aren't they? How can you live happily for others if you are unhappy? The ancients said, every man for himself, the devil takes the hindmost, isn't it?

If you are alive, you must work hard for yourself. Study in order to live comfortably in the future; Go to work, in order to support themselves; Have fun, for your own good mood; Laugh, laugh because you are happy, start with yourself and end with yourself.