Nikon or Canon for portrait shooting?

Question 1: Is it better to shoot portraits with Canon SLR or scenery? By the way, introduce Nikon. Canon and Nikon are both excellent, but the emphasis is different. Canon is fast and has obvious advantages over Nikon in telephoto field, which depends on the fact that Canon's body aperture is larger than Nikon's, and the research and development potential of large aperture lens is greater, more convenient and lower in cost. Canon's super zoom has reached 1200mm, while Nikon has developed to 600mm, and the effect is not as good as Canon's 600mm. In terms of wide angle, Nikon has a slight advantage over Canon in imaging clarity. In terms of hue, Canon is precise and natural warm, while Nikon is rich in cool. Therefore, Canon is used for portrait shooting and Nikon is used for landscape shooting. Canon is used for sharpness, Nikon is used for sharpness, or each has its own emphasis. Because Canon is fast, sports reporters generally use Canon, which is the white cannon next to the sports ground that everyone sees. But Canon's low-end products can be said to be cheaper, but not as kind as Nikon, especially the lens. Canon's dog head can be like a dog, Nikon's dog head can be used, but the body is not much better. It can be said that the low-end Nikon is better than the high-end Canon, which depends on your own choice. If you play with film, I will tell you without hesitation: use Nikon. If you ask about digital SLR, I will say: almost. It is more cost-effective to use Nikon at the entry level. After all, SLR is to play with the lens. Am I objective when I speak with Canon?

Tell me a budget and I'll recommend it to you. I don't look at the parameter recommendation provided online, but I recommend it with experience. Don't spray it without touching it!

Question 2: Shooting landscapes, people, SLR, Nikon or Canon on Nikon's land … The answer is of course Nikon's hunger …

But taking portraits, Canon's high-end is very good ~

85mm f 1.2L is a good thing that Nikon doesn't have ~

Recommended ... Nikon d90 18- 105 set+50 mm f/1.8d.

Or, canon 40D 17-85 sets+50mm f/1.8ii.

Question 3: Is it better to take a portrait as Canon or Nikon? No one is better than Canon or Nikon. Canon is softer and Nikon is sharper, but Nikon's skin is rough when released directly. But it will be fine after the later stage. And sharp photos are more emotional.

Quan Huafu is better or half a frame is better. Obviously, Quan Huafu is good. Fortunately, many people will tell you that the image quality is better, but many people understand that the better image quality is determined by the hardware of the camera. In fact, Quan Huafu's advantage lies in the same framework. For example, if I take a bust, the image quality in Quan Huafu is better with a large aperture, because for example, for lenses with apertures of 50mm and 1.8, for a half-frame Canon, it is 80mm and f 1.8, and for Nikon, it is 75mm and 1.8. From the perspective of depth of field, Quan Huafu's is better. In other words, Quan Huafu can give full play to the performance of lenses with more than half a frame, especially in the case of large aperture. So the landlord has money, I suggest the whole picture.

As for the camera, the one in Quan Huafu will do. Canon recommends 60d for half width, and Nikon recommends d7000 or d7 100. Canon's 60d half-width is the most cost-effective. Compared with 550d, 600d, 650d and 700d, the viewfinder of 60d is a pentagonal mirror, and the other four are pentagonal mirrors. The official standard battery for the 60d is 1800 mAh, and others seem to be 1200. There is also a window showing iso and shutter on the 60d, and nothing else. Of course, the processors of 650d and 700d are five generations, and the other four generations. But the biggest function of the processor is speed, which is reflected in continuous shooting and video. But it is unwise to shoot video with a SLR instead of taking it to the stadium, so the processor is of little significance. 70d is an upgrade of 60d, that is,18 million pixels is upgraded to 22 million, and the processor generation 4 is upgraded to generation 5, so it is of little significance, but the price is much more expensive. Nikon's d90 and Canon's 60d have the same configuration, but120,000 pixels are always a little low, so we recommend its upgraded version d7000 or d7 100. You should be careful, Canon's 60d and Nikon's d90 are the best-selling SLR, which makes sense and is the success of these two machines, Kodak, Fuji, Samsung and Nikon. For the lens, it is recommended to buy a cheap one, because you will find that it is 18-55, 55-250, 17-85, 18- 135,18-/kloc-0. The so-called "a mirror travels all over the world" refers to a wide zoom range, not a good picture quality.

So photography, technology first, lens second, camera third (such as card, micro-single, SLR and Quan Huafu SLR), its own structure determines that in the case of large aperture, the same framing, Quan Huafu >; Half-frame > micro-single > card machine, which is reflected in the definition and background requirements, and these also make the picture cleaner. But these are the results of the lens, so the lens is more effective than the camera)

Question 4: Is it better to shoot people and night scenes with Nikon SLR or Canon SLR? You made a D3. Absolutely awesome. Or D300 or Fuji S5. Canon 5D is too old.

Both D80 and 450D stand on one side. Don't think that Canon's noise suppression is good. After using it, you will know that Canon's noise reduction is at the expense of details. Personally, I think the noise reduction effect is not as good as that of software and Canon JPEG files, even for ISO 100 films. The noise has been reduced. So it looks less noisy. Actually, it is not. Nikon is characterized by less internal processing. So Nikon's film looks less clean than Canon's. In fact, this is done to preserve details. Even with D80. Just use NEF. Do it with NX in the future. Absolutely beautiful.

At present, except Nikon D3. Any machine with ISO higher than 1600 is basically useless.

Question 5: Is Canon camera good at taking portraits? Or Nikon? Both are big brands, so it's no problem to take portraits.

However, Canon has a portrait head with an ultra-large aperture of EF 85mm F 1.2L, while Nikon's 85mm lens has a maximum aperture of only F 1.4. In addition, the skin of the characters photographed by Canon is red, which looks better. But now I don't care if the colors of digital photos are randomly adjusted.

In short, both of them are very good, and there are more people taking portraits with Canon.

Question 6: Is Canon really more suitable for taking portraits than Nikon? Why is it actually quite appropriate? What matters is what lens you use and who took it. Even if there is a difference, it doesn't matter much to people who are not great gods.

Question 7: Is it better to shoot people with Canon or Nikon? It used to be said that there are Canon portraits and Nikon landscapes, but now the newly listed SLR and Nikon portraits are basically not much different in color.

Question 8: Which is better, Nikon or Canon? Which is more suitable for shooting people? Depends on what you think. Nikon's films are sharp and highly reproducible, which can objectively reflect the theme. Canon's films are softer and more tense. Obviously, if you want to represent Nikon, if you want to make something artistic, it is Canon. Of course, the actual difference between these two brands is often difficult for us to observe.

20 1 1 year

Question 9: Is Canon really more suitable for portrait shooting than Nikon? Why one is that the color style shot by Canon is more suitable for people's skin color, and the other is that there is no "idiot" like Nikon. In fact, there is no question of whether the equipment is suitable or not. The key is whether people can shoot.

Question 10: Which is better, Canon 70d or Nikon d7 100? 70D out of focus, D7 100 color is not good.

70D video recording is powerful, but it is loose to take out-of-focus photos. D7 100 has no low-pass filter, and the photographic clarity is 70 days.

70D amateur, major D7 100.

70D large plastic shell, D7 100 large area metal.

70D 19 point full cross focusing, the camera focusing accuracy is very general, and the video can be autofocused quickly and accurately.

D7 100, 5 1 point AF focusing, the focusing element is the same as D800, which is two grades higher than 70D, but video recording cannot achieve autofocus.

The 70D has a wifi module, which can transmit photos to the mobile phone in time. D7 100 has no wifi module.

70D has a touch screen, which is very easy to use and beginners learn quickly. D7 100 has no touch screen, so it's not easy to get started, but after getting familiar with it, you will find that the operation is obviously better than Canon's computer science and ergonomics.

70-day portraits perform well in skin color, but their tolerance is low. D7 100 color is suitable for any subject except portrait. If you are proficient in PS, then ignore it.

70D+ low-end Canon lens = rubbish. 70D+ bull's head = can't give full play to all the advantages of Quan Huafu lens.

D7 100+ Nikon low-end lens = good imaging quality. D7 100+ tauren = can't give full play to all the advantages of the whole map.

Canon lens group is the most abundant, but the high, middle and low-grade imaging is very different, and the quality of workmanship is uneven. The typical 10 yuan is divided into three parts.

Nikon's lens group is not as rich as Canon's, but the quality of workmanship is relatively uniform, and the low-end lens group is kind, and the imaging quality from low-end to high-end is good.

If you are just having fun, I suggest you choose 70D. If you want to improve yourself and study hard, please choose D7 100.

If you use more Canon, please choose 70D. If you use more Nikon, please choose D7 100.

Personally, I feel that the comprehensive quality of D7 100 is over 70D, and the difference between them is consistent with the actual selling price. (Premise is the licensed price)

I am a double major supporter of Canon Nikon, and I hope to help you to some extent!