Z Tao was publicly defended by female photographers for using unauthorized photos. How to evaluate the practices of both sides?

I think there is nothing wrong with Z.TAO apologizing at the first time. On the contrary, the photographer is resolute, unreasonable and a little unreasonable. Obviously, it is for the sake of popularity hype, using the star effect, which is really disgusting.

Z. Tao Weibo once promoted a set of astrological images, and later the photographer accused the infringement. Z.TAO apologized to the photographer for the first time after seeing it. He added photos to the original Weibo and marked the photographer's name. But because the photographer didn't respond, Z.TAO deleted the photo. Therefore, the photographer believes that Z.TAO refused to admit the theft after stealing other people's works and did not bear the consequences. First of all, Z.TAO's infringement was wrong, but after learning that the photos he used were infringing, he immediately apologized to the photographer and marked the photographer's name, which was very sincere.

Secondly, after Z.TAO apologized, he didn't get a response from the photographer. If he still uses pictures, the infringement problem still exists, so he deleted his Weibo. Under normal thinking, Z.TAO did the right thing. He did his best. Why does the photographer insist? The photographer's practice can't help but make people think, do you want to gain benefits or promote yourself? If it was to protect his rights and interests, Z.TAO apologized and deleted his Weibo, which was enough. Obviously, photographers want to make a lot of money.

The photographer didn't respond to Z.TAO's two apologies, and didn't make any demands, so he let the public opinion ferment. As an artist, Z.TAO immediately took remedial measures, apologized and deleted the pictures. Legally speaking, the infringer shall bear civil liability for compensation after stopping the infringement, eliminating the influence, making an apology and compensating for the losses. However, after Z.TAO deleted Weibo, Miss Ye did not think that the infringement was terminated. On the contrary, she thinks that Z.TAO is destroying evidence and criticizing Tao Zhe.

The infringer is actively asking for compensation to make up for his fault, but the infringer has not considered safeguarding rights. Instead, he wrote an article criticizing the infringer for admitting his mistake and letting time continue to ferment, obviously in order to make a fortune. It's speechless and disgusting.