Which is more worth buying, Canon 90D or 6D2?

On the premise of sufficient budget, choose one of the two, of course, 6D2, and enter the full-frame machine. As long as the door is not changed, the matching head can always be used. Try to save money to buy red circle heads to avoid replacement losses.

Although 90D is a new model, APS will definitely want to replace it with the improvement of your technology and vision. The dog's head is only a standard, and it is definitely a loss to change it.

Specific parameters, various comparisons, and many online evaluations are all very detailed.

Which is more worth buying, Canon 90D or 6D2?

These two machines are only a few hundred dollars apart, and they are both SLR. Canon also has a similar positioning for them, thinking that they are the choice of photographers. One is Quan Huafu, and the other is a remnant. Each has its own advantages. Which one to choose depends on your purpose and interest.

Let's start with the conclusion. If you are a commercial photographer, or like to shoot birds and sports events, then choose 90D, which can be used as an alternative machine. If you are a novice and want to learn photography or take pictures of children at home or travel to take pictures of scenery, choose 6D2.

If you are engaged in business activities, 90D is naturally more professional in terms of parameters. High-pixel, high-speed continuous shooting, brand-new processor, scenery shooting and sports events are all good choices. However, because it is incomplete, it is not very "professional" to use it to contact business activities, and customers may also recognize it. So it can only be used as a kind of commercial shooting machine. Moreover, it is a single card slot. As a commercial camera, it can only be an alternative. To say that the most suitable crowd is bird lovers.

As for 6D2, if you are a novice, you will naturally choose Quan Huafu at the same price. The shooting effect is better, the lens is more professional, portrait shooting and still life shooting are very good, which is a good choice for beginners to feel the charm of photography. However, 6D2 has congenital defects, poor tolerance, slow continuous shooting speed, and less focus ... all these have led professionals to despise it. However, for beginners and photographers, its functions are actually quite sufficient, and these deficiencies have little impact on daily shooting of children, traveling and shooting scenery.

In addition, apart from the difference in parameters, they also have a very important difference: late investment. In addition to the body lens, SLR cameras are also very important. Although Quan Huafu lenses have more choices and better quality than afterimages, they are also more expensive. So the lens is also part of the budget. Of course, it is not impossible to buy only one 24 105 or 50 1.8 for daily shooting, depending on everyone's needs.

The choice of camera is always the first step to crush people. Although 90D is the latest APS-C camera just released, it is still a residual camera no matter how good its performance is. All your lenses will be magnified by the camera X 1.6. What should I do if I buy a broken lens one day?

Not long ago, I encountered this problem. Even the best disabled machine is still disabled, but it can't be said that the disabled machine is not good enough. Choosing a camera depends on the purpose of use. Ordinary players are not so professional. In fact, 90D is still very good. Take photos and videos to record a family life. That's enough. You don't have to spend so much money to buy the whole picture.

However, if you have plans to take good photos in the future and have a very strong passion for shooting, 6D2 is actually a good choice. I don't need to introduce a lot about online performance evaluation, so I won't say it.

The biggest advantage of 6D2 is the sensor, which means that the lens is crushed to death at the bottom. The lens does not need the coefficient of X 1.6, and the blur is much stronger than the afterimage. Otherwise, your large aperture lens is not for nothing, but if you are not so keen on photography, just take a photo casually. In fact, 90D is still ok.

In the long run, 6D2 is actually recommended. After all, no one wants to keep changing cameras. Anyway, 6D2 is also Quan Huafu, and all indicators are excellent. It can't be said to be the best, and it's not a loss. The biggest advantage of 90D lies in its brand-new release, updated sensors, higher pixels and faster shooting speed. Depends on what you like. You can accept their shortcomings. When you accept their shortcomings, you can buy them.

This mainly depends on what you take. If you want to shoot children or fast-moving objects or people, those fast-moving objects, such as birds, can be used for 90 days. If you take a wedding photo, you don't usually take anything, not something that moves very fast. Then 6.2 90d focuses on continuous shooting, and the picture quality is not as fast as 6d2, and 6d2 focuses on continuous shooting, but the picture quality is good.

I suggest buying a 6D2 machine. After buying 90, I still want to go to the whole picture. After all, the lens group is different, and the data of 90 devices is very good. But you have to understand that the lens it faces is these things, either out of focus or pulling bellows or small aperture. No matter how good the data is, it will definitely not get into the whole picture. 90 is still an Aps, and it will definitely not be compared with the whole picture.

If I had to choose, I would definitely choose 6D instead of 90D. After all, 6D is Quan Huafu. Murder in the first grade [laugh] [laugh] [laugh] [laugh]

Canon 90D is half frame, and 6d2 is Quan Huafu. There is not much difference in price. If you want quality, you must choose 6d2.

Personally, I think 6D2, if you have a few broken shots before, you can consider 90D. After all, it's all real money!

This is mainly because Canon 90D adopts brand-new 32.5 megapixel CMOS and Digic8 processors. Therefore, this camera can record 4K video (no cropping and 1.2X mode), support Canon's brand-new CR3 and Craw file formats, support digital correction technology with built-in lens, and support improved "highlight tone priority" and "automatic brightness" functions ... As for other configurations, the 90D adopts a brand-new RGB module with 220,000 pixels, and the continuous shooting speed reaches10f.

Based on the characteristics of 90D, I only recommend this product to three types of photographers:

In fact, the native video function of Canon 80D is perfect, but the biggest weakness of 80D video is that it does not support 4K video. Now 90D has made up this short board. I believe that Canon 90D will be a good video SLR in the next 2~3 years.

Canon 90D has a continuous shooting speed of 65,438+00 fps, and the newly added 220,000-pixel RGB module makes it a leader in Canon's half-frame SLR focusing. It can completely replace the positions of Canon 7D and 7D2 and become a new generation of APS-C format "Bird Machine". In addition, the camera's advantage of 32.5 million pixels also helps to get better picture details.

Similarly, 90D325,000 pixel sensor is also good for macro field. Moreover, Canon SLR opens LV mode, which can use high-efficiency and high-precision dual-core focusing technology, which is also a unique weapon for shooting macro.

But if your subject matter has nothing to do with the above three photography fields, then don't consider 90D. This camera has designed 32.5 million pixels on the half-frame sensor, which is equivalent to 83 million pixels in the full frame! Such a high "pixel per inch" is a "great challenge" for most lenses.

I have M50 in my hand now, and I used to have 80D. On these two 24-megapixel APS-C cameras, many lenses are not satisfactory. As for the 90D with 32.5 million pixels, it is certain that only "heavy artillery" and "macro lens" can give full play to its high pixel advantage!

Which is more worth buying, Canon 90D or 6D2?

The prices of the two cameras are not much different, one is a broken camera (but new) and the other is a full-frame camera. Hard to choose!