Is p2 Sony or Leica?

can p>P2 PRO afford Lycra lens? The answer is, of course, you can't afford to

promote Leica just to avoid Sony

Huawei's main theme is "patriotism". If you promote Sony, wouldn't you be beating yourself?

The IMX6 used by P2Pro is Sony's CMOS

Then Huawei asked Leica to help with dimming and color matching (obtained Leica certification)

Huawei signed an exclusive agreement with Sony for two years (excluding other competitors)

Personally, I want to use the IMX6 ... series of Sony CMOS in the future. It is very likely that Huawei will sign an exclusive agreement for about two years.

How much Sony's CMOS camera goes against the world through the exclusive agreement of Apple and Huawei, and the vigorous promotion with Xiaomi and OPPO can also be seen.

Almost all mobile phone owners are Sony.

The main camera of Samsung S1 is unknown, but if Samsung really uses its own CMOS camera and the effect is comparable to Sony, it will definitely be overwhelming. Because Samsung has frequently released the signal that Sony will replace it in cmos field, it is only disappointing so far, and it is only inferred by all parties that 5G adopts its own CMOS at present.

CMOS from Samsung and OV factories have been active as secondary cameras, which is the difference between heaven and earth. The primary camera is comparable to the processor, and even more important than the processor now, but the secondary camera is often cheap. If you don't hesitate to spend money on CMOS, you can all adopt Sony's IMX series

Huawei p2 and P2.

In the past, mobile phone manufacturers always promoted the Qualcomm Opteron processor, which shows the importance of the processor. But this year, the manufacturers mainly promoted the three-camera. In fact, whether it is single-camera, double-camera, three-camera, four-camera or six-camera, it comes down to Sony IMX series CMOS…… ... It can be seen that the camera function is important for mobile phones now, and besides the design itself, the most important thing is that when official website introduced Huawei, he deliberately avoided the information of Japanese suppliers. It's easy to understand, after all, the disclosure of information about Japanese companies will hurt Huawei's image (after all, "patriotism" is involved)

Sometimes quality is far superior to quantity, and 44 suppliers from the United States and Japan are Huawei's real "key". When Huawei predicted the risk, it first asked Japanese companies to supply in large quantities (Murata Manufacturing Co., Toshiba Memory, Roma (ROHM), Kyocera, etc.), which also reflected the problem. As a measure, the share will be great

Huawei and Xiaomi are not much different in essence. pot calling the kettle black

Huawei not only uses Sony CMOS, but also signed an exclusive agreement (Apple is the same, and Samsung was the same (the future is unknown))

There is a huge gap between Samsung's CMOS and Sony, and the concept of Samsung is always full of water. Samsung's 8K TV is far less than Sony's 4K, so you can imagine how much water Samsung has poured. Today, Samsung's 48-megapixel GM1 is called "pseudo-48w", which is actually not much different from "12w". If Samsung really adopts its own GM1, it is actually not much different from suicide, and it will be hanged by competitors ...

If Samsung blows S1+ to hang the iphone again, the main camera is still Sony's IMX363

There is still one thing that is unclear from the parameters. Is it that the performance difference of Samsung GM1 is beyond imagination, and even IMX363 is far worse?

I agree with the statement that helping Samsung defend that "the bottom level is crushing people", but it can't solve the "influence caused by the pixel gap". Samsung s1 series mobile phones are very good at cmos algorithm, which gives full play to the advantages of imx363, but the huge performance gap of cmos itself can't be solved by algorithm alone. Samsung's mastery of CMOS algorithm is probably as good as GOOGLE's. It's far better than Xiaomi in the past (Sony's CMOS was born and abolished, which became a negative textbook and a positive textbook GOOGLE), but is it useful in front of Apple and Huawei (which can get technical support from Lycra)

Since CMOS involves the bottom and pixels, it is naturally important. Samsung's statement that it ignores pixels is simply sophistry. Of course, this is only for Sony's CMOS. If it is Samsung's own CMOS, I'm afraid it's not enough to just consider the bottom, pixels and algorithm. God knows how many problems exist in Samsung's own CMOS. Sony's CMOS is a mature product, which has long been recognized by the market. Samsung's CMOS has always existed as a secondary camera (Samsung itself has always done so).