What is the final outcome of those who insist on mobile photography without a later stage?

My answer is that a person who insists on mobile phone photography without post-production will have an impact on his "final outcome", but the impact should be small. However, you should learn post-photography, because it is an integral part of photography and there are also shortcomings in the process of photography.

When shooting by yourself, use a camera and a mobile phone; Whether it is camera film or mobile phone film, some need post-production, and some don't need post-production, so there is no unity. In the later stage of the photo, the individual's thoughts and behaviors are the same:

1. Post-photography is a part of the photography process. Through the later stage, the photos that bring defects when shooting are corrected and corrected. Of course, there is no problem with the photos, so I don't need them later. For example, the light ratio between the subject and the background is too large, the composition is not suitable for cutting, color cast and insufficient illumination. Correcting the problems in the photos is as normal as "people are sick and need treatment". But I personally don't agree that later photos are icing on the cake. If it's really icing on the cake, it's making something out of nothing and practicing fraud.

2, timely shooting, photos generally do not need later. When shooting, you can fully compose the subject, choose the light and angle, and the whole process has brewing and consideration time, so this kind of photo basically does not need post-stage. For example, people like "take a trip here" and "take a group photo", the scenery of blue sky and white clouds, sunrise and sunset, and so on.

3, documentary capture, most photos need to be later. Documentary photography, the first thing is to seize the wonderful moment, which not only reflects the authenticity, but also has something to watch. Therefore, the brain, eyes and hands should be coordinated, especially the "hands-on" should be fast, and sometimes even the continuous shooting should be started. In this case, the photos taken inevitably have the defects mentioned above: there are intruders at the edge, the local brightness is not enough, the color cast is obvious and so on. In this case, it is necessary to post-process the photos and try to be perfect.

So whether the photos are late or not depends on whether there are any problems with the photos. If there is a problem, it should be retouched later. To this end, a friendly reminder: photography, you don't have to insist on "non-mobile phone", isn't the camera more professional? Later, I didn't insist on it. Wouldn't it be better if there were no problems with the photos?

Mobile phone photography, as long as it is taken well, will still be appreciated without later stage. If you shoot with a professional SLR, the shooting level is not enough. Even if you shoot with a camera of 100,000 yuan, no one will appreciate it.

Photography is not understandable in a few words. If you want to shoot good works, you have to practice and shoot more, and you can't just repair a lot of works in the later stage.

Shooting with a mobile phone in good light, some don't need the later stage, but the later stage feels unreal. Too much dependence on the later stage will destroy the clarity and color of the photo.

With the continuous progress of mobile phone manufacturing technology, mobile phone photography is more and more accepted by the public. As for those who don't use their mobile phones to take photos later, the final result must be that the more they use their mobile phones, the more convenient they are, and the more they use them. Please rest assured.

Is there a problem with the post-processing of mobile phone photography? The result is: everyone asks what software to use for post-processing, and the photos are so beautiful!

Post-production of photos with software is like an ugly woman entering a beauty salon for plastic surgery. No wonder the doll gene has leaked secrets all his life!

There is a popular saying among friends in the circle-photos are straight out, do you understand? Do not believe you buy a Huawei P40pro mobile phone to experience it. You can also buy a Mate30, just compare with me!

I'm glad to answer your question. There is nothing wrong with insisting on not using mobile phone photography, and there are no consequences. The result is that people who know him leave an impression. He just took pictures casually, didn't know how to retouch, didn't appreciate retouching, just stopped, and the photos had no appreciation value. A photo is soulless without post-modification, even if your mobile phone is the best in the world, it is the same. If you don't believe me, just look at their works in major forums, photographers and professional photographers.

What I want to say is that mobile phone photography does not need to be followed by others, and the final outcome is still on the road of photography and entertainment! Although post-photography is a part of photography, it does not mean that every photo must have post-photography, but it depends on the artistic effect expressed by each self-portrait picture. I think it is a good work to clearly show the pure and natural beauty from different angles or record wonderful moments!

I like taking pictures of flowers very much. It is much more convenient to shoot with a mobile phone than with a camera, and there is no post-shooting. In addition to the higher definition of the camera than that of the mobile phone, the works taken by the mobile phone are also very beautiful.

As long as you shoot well on your mobile phone, people will still enjoy it without post-shooting. If photography is not simple, you can make it clear. Whether it is a mobile phone or a camera, pre-shooting is very important. You need to shoot more and practice more to make a good work, and you can't repair a good work just by shooting later.

Mobile phone shooting needs good light and good composition, and some don't need later, but it doesn't feel as good as the original picture when it comes out later.

Nowadays, mobile phone manufacturing technology has been continuously improved, and mobile phone photography has become more and more popular among the public.

I think people who insist on taking photos with their mobile phones without later stage will definitely think that the more convenient the mobile phones are, the better. Please rest assured.

These are all flowers taken by mobile phones, and they have never been late.

Post-production of photos is normal, but most of them do not need post-production. Mobile phone, weather and personal shooting technology will determine the quality of photos. The photos sent were taken with Samsung NOTE 10+, with automatic mode and autofocus, bare metal, and no post-production original film.

First of all, this topic is not very authentic, and the word "ending" seems to be too heavy. The later stage of mobile phone photography is a complicated learning process. First of all, he should have a solid photographic foundation, correctly understand the relationship between color, light and shadow and the subject, know how to download the PS software of mobile phone, and make up for some defects in shooting through post-processing, especially shooting close-ups of some characters with backlight. Without a reflector, he can use mobile phone software to brighten, darken and blur the background of the dark part of his face, making the subject more prominent and distinct. All this is a little difficult in the learning process, which is why some people give up mobile phone photography and don't do the later stage. Of course, whether mobile photography is done or not varies from person to person. First, he doesn't know how to use mobile phone PS software for post-production. Second, the mobile phone scenery photos he took are very satisfied with the light, clarity, color and background of the subject, and there is no need for post-processing. Third, all this is different people's understanding of mobile phone photography, and has nothing to do with the so-called "ending" of not doing it.

I didn't make any post-modification to my photo, the original picture [yeah]