Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Is the micro-single or SLR around 5k inferior to the mobile phone?

Is the micro-single or SLR around 5k inferior to the mobile phone?

The portability and endurance are far less than those of mobile phones, and the quality of photos is better than that of mobile phones with different lenses. Personally, I feel that mobile phones are very practical. I used Huawei mate 10, and now I use Huawei mate30. I feel that it's much better to cope with hand-patting such as travel patting than SLR micro-single.

I suggest you find a camera of about 5K to play for half a year, even if you only use P files, even if you only look at the pictures on your mobile phone screen. Anyway, you can't understand the parameters I told you, and mobile phone operators can fool you by stealing the parameters of the concept. What mobile phone has 100 million pixels? It sounds awesome, but it's a coincidence.

Hello, I'm glad to answer your question:

1. Let's briefly analyze the imaging differences among SLR, micro-single and mobile phones.

The full name of "SLR" is "single lens reflex camera, also known as SLR camera. It is a camera that reflects the scenery with a lens. " "Reflection" means that a plane mirror in the camera separates the two light paths: when taking a view, the mirror falls and reflects the light of the lens onto the pentaprism, and finally people can observe the objects in the viewfinder of the camera through mirror reflection. This kind of viewfinder is called an optical viewfinder. Whether there is an optical viewfinder or not can also be considered as the biggest difference between SLR and other consumer portable digital cameras.

"Micro-camera" contains two meanings: micro-camera, compact, single-lens camera and replaceable single-lens camera, that is, this kind of camera is small in size and its imaging quality is similar to that of SLR, that is, micro-camera with SLR function is called micro-camera. However, many micro cameras are basically electronic viewfinders, not optical viewfinders, and the imaging quality is not as good as SLR.

"Mobile phone" is purely electronic framing and shooting, and the pixel point and imaging quality are not as good as SLR and micro-single. There are some beauty retouching functions, so there is still a gap between the color of the actual photos and the reality.

2. SLR, micro-single feature, suitable for people

(1) SLR: large, detachable, with lenses with different focal lengths and many operation buttons; Suitable for people who intend to develop in the direction of photography.

(2) Micro-single: small and stylish, some lenses can't be disassembled (a few lenses can be disassembled, but there is no adaptive telephoto lens); Suitable for girls and people who like retro and fashion.

suggestion

As a beginner in photography, girls can consider micro-single, and boys can consider SLR. However, if you want to develop in the direction of photography in the future, it is still recommended to buy a SLR and start from the basics; According to the improvement of skills and professional needs, we can adapt to all kinds of fixed-focus and zoom lenses, from the initial machine to the medium machine, and then from the medium machine to the high-end machine. If you only follow the camera occasionally, there is not much demand for image quality, just use your mobile phone.

I hope my answer is helpful to you! ! !

The bottom layer is crushing people. Look at the size of more than 5000 SLR sensors. What is the size of the cell phone sensor?

Looking at the sensor size, the sensor sizes of micro-single and SLR are much larger than those of mobile phones, and the two majors are not comparable. If it is a hobby, I want to play deeply and buy a SLR. If I want to shoot this tour, then the mobile phone is enough. If I want to see the high-end, but I don't want into the pit to be too deep, then I will choose the micro-single. Each has its own advantages and chooses according to its own situation.

If you just send a circle of friends, then use your mobile phone. But if it's photography, use a camera.

From the most basic principle, there is no difference between the two. The positioning of mobile phone camera function can be clearly affected without affecting the portability of the device. Moreover, the camera is large, even if the camera costs 5000 yuan, the color reproduction ability includes resolution, sharpness, tolerance, noise control and so on. , far more than any mobile phone, the corresponding portability is also much worse.

However, it is enough to take photos with a mobile phone+a circle of friends. The screen of the mobile phone is small, and the better picture quality cannot be reflected.

Personally, I feel that mobile phones and cameras are not the same type.

Let's talk about mobile phones first. I used to have a Huawei p20pro. At that time, the camera function of this mobile phone was already one of the best in the field of mobile phones. It's also good to take pictures with the rear three cameras, but in a word, it's just the phone for convenience. When you see a picture you like, it is very convenient and quick to take pictures, and there are also many intelligent systems in the mobile phone that automatically modify the photos after taking pictures, and adjust the exposure, aperture and shutter to the best state. More suitable for non-professional friends who like photography.

But the camera is different. More professional. I used the basic version of Canon D800 before. Whether taking pictures or videos, I think those two words are true. The photos taken by the camera are clearer and easier to modify later.

The mobile phone is still inferior to the camera, depending on the function.

They are not the same, just like rafts and yachts, cars and motorcycles. They are similar, but they are very different.

Don't say that. No matter how big the cell phone pixel is, the sensor will be so big. The camera effect of mobile phone mainly depends on post-imaging and algorithm, and the quality is not as good as that of micro-single SLR. Some people like to compare it because its capabilities and application scenarios can't replace the advantages of SLR at all. For example, if you buy a Ferrari and drive it on an elevated road at 40 kilometers per hour, it's just as comfortable. This is self-deception.

1000 entry SLR D3000 can kill ten thousand mobile phones! There is no comparability! Taking photos with a mobile phone and a documentary is inversely proportional, just like challenging others' majors with their own hobbies! !