What is a miniature 43 camera?

EPL 1 Micro 4/3 system (different from 135 SLR camera system and Panasonic &; The 4/3 system of Oba Alliance is a interchangeable lens digital camera (called evil in the industry (Sony's NEX series model is also a kind of evil, but it does not belong to Oba &；; Panasonic Alliance M4/3 system) It has no reflector (4/3 system has a reflector, which is a SLR). The fuselage is similar to a general digital camera, but it has a photosensitive element with the same size as a 4/3 system, so it has the same image quality as a SLR, and it needs a relatively small DC giant lens to provide the imaging ring (to put it bluntly, the area of CCD/CMOS increases, and the size of the lens will naturally increase. ) Because there is no reflector and complicated pentaprism, its framing relies on LCD framing or paraxial optical framing (to be purchased separately) or electronic viewfinder (to be purchased separately), so the framing principle is different from that of SLR.

Another advantage of M4/3 system is that its enamel distance is much smaller than that of SLR camera, which leads to that EVIL can get a shallower depth of field than DSLR under the same aperture (to put it bluntly, the background is more blurred). Because of its small size and outstanding image quality, more and more people are buying evil spirits now.

Micro is miniature, and 4/3 is the standard of CCD/CMOS format camera. 4/3 photosensitive element is one size smaller than APS system, and APS is one size smaller than full width. The advantage of the 4/3 specification is that the volume can be made smaller, M4/3 is smaller, and the CCD area is unchanged, but the reflector and pentaprism are eliminated, so the structure of M4/3 SLR greatly reduces the volume.

Single-lens reflex digital camera uses 5-prism or similar catadioptric principle to project the lens image directly to the viewfinder for photographers to watch. In this way, there is no parallax, color is natural color, and you have a direct understanding of composition and color. Therefore, it is generally adopted by professional photographers or photographers.

The digital imaging effect of SLR is the best among the three types of cameras, because its photosensitive devices (CCD, CMOS) are large in area, strong in resolving weak light, less in noise, changeable in lens and great in creative flexibility. Disadvantages are: the price is relatively high, the weight is heavy, and the use effect of low-end models is poor. Recommended: Nikon D80 D300, 18- 135 or 18-200 shockproof lens. If the picture is cheap, the D60 fuselage will do. Other brands of low-end fuselage are not recommended, and the cost performance is poor.

Telefocus digital uses a small area CCD and a large zoom ratio lens. You can shoot things far away. The viewfinder is usually an LCD screen or a Kepler paraxial optical viewfinder. The LCD viewfinder is a liquid crystal display screen, and the color and brightness are not very good. Even if you look at the small LCD viewfinder in the fuselage through the viewfinder, you can't see the real color and image details. Parallax exists in paraxial optical viewfinder because the optical axis is inconsistent with the eye axis, and the correct imaging of composition often changes. The convenience of long focal length is that you can shoot distant things more flexibly, but unfortunately, the area of photosensitive equipment is small and the lens structure is complex, which causes congenital deficiency, and the imaging quality is not the same as that of a digital camera with triple zoom. The advantage is that it is convenient to use and can be photographed far and near. The disadvantage is that it is slightly bigger. Suitable for tourists who like to take pictures but have low requirements for imaging. If you like sneak shots, this is not bad either.

M4/3 is the imaging format of Olympus SLR or optical viewfinder camera. I am not familiar with them. Personally, I feel that they are not mainstream. Optical imaging is better than LCD, but CCD area is smaller than digital SLR, and its cost performance is very average. I don't know much about others. Panasonic seems to have joined this camp.

That's all I can say. I suggest you go to the forum where the shadows are unscrupulous.