Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Is it infringement to draw photos?
Is it infringement to draw photos?
Is it infringement to draw works according to other people's photos?
Using the photographer's photographic works as illustrations, and because of commercial use, whether it is infringement can not be generalized, and it can be divided into non-infringement and suspected infringement.
First, it does not constitute infringement: "Painting is painting, and photography is photography. The two are completely different in technical means and materials. The painting for reference is used by the painter as the material, but it is only a reference, at most it is improper and does not constitute infringement. " Although photography and painting are sister arts, their forms of expression and creative methods are completely different. Article 22 of the Copyright Law stipulates that the copyright owner can use it without permission or payment 12 cases. Item (10): Copying, painting, photographing and video recording works of art set up or placed in outdoor public places.
Second, suspected infringement: Although Article 22 of the Copyright Law stipulates that the copyright owner can use 12 cases without permission and without payment, Paragraph 10: Copying, painting, photographing and video recording works of art set up or displayed in outdoor public places. However, if the photographic works are not set up or listed in outdoor public places, they are obtained by copying, shooting or copying, and then they are created into paintings for commercial use, which is suspected of infringement. At the same time, Article 46 of the Copyright Law stipulates eleven kinds of infringements, including (4) distorting or tampering with other people's works, and (5) plagiarizing other people's works.
In judicial pragmatism, making other works (non-similar works) in different art categories should not be regarded as infringement if we only learn from his composition thought; If it is used for commercial purposes and obtains considerable benefits, it should be considered as suspected infringement. At least from the perspective of fair liability and causality, the borrower (beneficiary) can also be determined to give corresponding compensation or compensation.
The above contents are related answers. Whether painting with some photographic photos constitutes infringement needs to be determined according to specific circumstances. Photography and painting are two different materials. If you paint with photos as the material, it should be an act and generally does not constitute infringement.
- Previous article:What are the skills to make a speech attractive?
- Next article:Why did the optical zoom of mobile phone camera I change from 10x to 3.5x?
- Related articles
- Can I wear glasses in photos taken at Level 4 or Level 6?
- Kant's Three Criticism
- How to distinguish bright pearls from dyed pearls and natural pearls
- A photographer who shoots female subjects.
- On a car with a camera for anti-shake, what is the level of BYD Yun Nian, which can only cost more than 300,000 yuan to experience?
- What about Shenzhen Fulangda Technology Co., Ltd.?
- Is there a store specializing in evening dresses or wedding dresses in Nanchang?
- When will reno6 pro go on sale?
- A Brief Introduction to the Melody of The Mermaid Part I and Part II
- Where is the Huangnan Ancient Road? Is the Huangnan Ancient Road near the sea?