Is the picture quality of Fuji X 100S really good?

Just talking about image quality, this topic is too subjective.

But some basic technical parameters of the equipment can also be reflected.

Several basic technical factors affecting image quality;

The larger the area and frame of the photosensitive element, the better the imaging quality;

The aperture of the lens is easy to understand. The larger the aperture, the greater the luminous flux and the better the image quality.

Of course, there are CMOS components. Generally, the three primary colors are juxtaposed on the same floor. In the past, Sigma was a three-layer, three-layer and three-color structure, and the picture quality was quite distinctive.

But on the whole, Fuji X 100S is a good machine, and its size, reaction speed and image quality have improved many problems of the previous generation. Worth holding.

I just bought a set. At that time, I was not satisfied with X 100, and it was almost gone on X 100S.

In terms of image quality, I am engaged in photography (mainly for auction companies), and I use 135, 120, a large-format camera. Personally, I feel that the pictures taken by X 100S can still meet the basic needs of commercial pictures.