Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Film Review of Xiangjiang River North
Film Review of Xiangjiang River North
Just when Xiang Jiang Bei Qu made people sleepy after shouting the main melody slogan, Ina, who played the second female in "After 8s", stunningly played Tao Siyong, a talented woman in Changsha, unexpectedly ended up resisting the violent revolution in Hunan, and said goodbye to her "friends" angrily. Something was wrong. In addition, Zhou Dongyu plays Yang Kaihui (so fearless in books), and the film is a girl who has no opinion of longing for love. She joined party member for her husband and didn't know anything about politics at all. It is worth it to write in the closing subtitles that she died so tragically. More like a great irony! The author quietly found that the director of "Xiang Jiang Bei Qu" had been in a state of vacillation, and he didn't dare to shoot what he wanted.
Chen Li, a female directors in the Mainland, is by no means a big name, but she directed the family film Ballet for Two. However, because Ni Ping and Ai Liya played tear-jerking inspirational roles, they created an adoring, superstitious and prejudiced grandmother, and the characters always adhered to the belief that "civilians create miracles" and succeeded in shining brilliantly. Ballet for Two won the Golden Rooster Best Photography Award, which is not a great achievement, but it can beat heavyweight works such as Mobile Phone, Jasmine Blossom and House of Flying Daggers. Director Chen Li's outstanding aesthetic attainments are quite admirable. However, "Xiang Jiang Bei Qu" degenerates into being too far away from the masses, and flatters the situation too much, and casually shoots a leader's "hard" past, just like a diagram to carry out the "main theme" to the end. The result: the revolutionary slogan is loud enough, the lyric soundtrack runs through from beginning to end, the characters are deliberately tall, big and complete, and they dare to say what they want to say, but it is hard to cover up their peaceful essence!
At the beginning of the film, before Chairman Mao became the revolutionary leader of China, a local citizen rushed in and worshipped him as an idol superstar. Mao Runzhi, played by Bao Jianfeng, speaks authentic Hunan dialect and walks into the primary school hall. He teaches the children how the country should be self-reliant and self-reliant, how the country can prosper, why it should overthrow the decadent regime and pay for sponsorship to poor students, and then the principal says who he is, afraid of getting into trouble and must be dismissed! At this time, sensational music sounded, tragic? Disgusting? Melodramatic? I'm tired of playing in the old theme, so why shoot it? It goes without saying! Next, a look at Li Zixiong's Chen Duxiu becomes a cup-throwing cynic. He talks about the imperialist powers bullying China, how decadent the political situation is, and how stubborn stereotyped writing is, and then he throws a cup to play. The old man just dropped several cups, and he forgot. The problem is that you have dropped the cup for a long time. Can you solve any problems? Or does it show that the memory of revolutionary martyrs has problems? And Chairman Mao designed a gymnastics, and all the revolutionary students in the school are doing it. It's shocking! Make a scene!
There is no denying that any national leader, who started from the armed revolution, can achieve unprecedented success, and all of them are strong and extraordinary. The same is true of Mr. Mao Zedong in Xiang Jiang Bei Qu. He has taught books, worked as a coolie and personally been to the mining area. Who can do all these places and jobs? Only by making full use of experiments and understanding people's feelings can the revolution succeed! He kept saying that in order to do the revolution, he had chosen to lie on the track to attract attention. Also, because someone in the mine was caught by the Japanese and organized a resistance movement privately, the problem was that he would never die if he went to lie on the track. Typically, he did whatever it took to achieve his goal. He denounced the masses to save the miners, and as a result, his men gathered together, but they didn't save them. It is China's future to save thousands of people in Qian Qian. The problem is that a group of men with guns and bombs have formed a revolutionary death squad, and even one person can't be saved. What is the future of China? On the contrary, the warlord said that he was not trying to save people, but he was ambitious. Although Bao Jianfeng played "Schindler", he was always so compassionate, always so hard-working, always so hands-on, and pulled a cart to see his sweetheart off, saying goodbye to Iraqis at the station, playing romantic stream of consciousness, and "Going to the North of Xiangjiang River" shaped the main theme leader, which was still a false and deliberate Gao Daquan!
Now that times have changed, will revolutionary beliefs change? Will what ordinary people want to see change? Why did Xiang Jiang Bei Qu encounter the worldly indifference of the star-studded Great Party Building? I don't want to discuss it! However, the slogan of "Going to the North of Xiangjiang River" is blunt and outrageous, and the story goes through the motions like a running account. People don't see a humanized revolutionary leader. The woman who once admired him in the story angrily left, and his beloved wife suffered a tragic death. Not only is it difficult to remember hope and glory, but it is more like a great irony of going to the North of Xiangjiang River! This is a work with excellent photography, art design and soundtrack. Zhou Dongyu, the post-9 s chief "girl-seeking" who owns "Love of Hawthorn Trees", plays a thin love drama, with energetic young actors such as Bao Jianfeng, Ina, Tao Shuai and Zhou Yiwei, and even has a subtle "rebellious" spirit. It is filmed for the political theme of the 9th anniversary of the founding of the Party, full of cliché s and praises, which is completely boring.
Another digression: As soon as I saw the cast list, I lost my desire to see it. I have no opinion about the actors themselves, but the director's ability to choose roles is really speechless.
- Related articles
- Is it true that cerebral palsy makes more money?
- Wafangdian New York new york wedding photography
- A descriptive composition on the ruins
- You must marry an odd number of people on your wedding day. How many photographers are there?
- Despise "new business"
- As a beginner in astronomy, how to choose an astronomical telescope?
- Is Fanka Tourism Shooting False Marketing?
- The whole network is consuming big clothes. How to treat Zhu Zhiwen's appearance in men's clothing, which attracted ridicule?
- What about Yunnan Moore Culture Communication Co., Ltd.?
- Free Ticket Policy for Lushan Tickets 2022