Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Tourist attractions - Tourism Law Case Analysis
Tourism Law Case Analysis
It is a breach of contract by the travel agency. The contract must be expressed in popular or conventional language. As for the travel agency making clerical errors, that is the travel agency's responsibility.
The travel agency must refund the three-island fee advanced by the guest, and refund the corresponding fee for not visiting the Fuchun River (this fee must be agreed upon by both the travel agency and the tourist).
Tourists cannot request to go through the agreed itinerary again on this basis. The travel agency will only refund the guest's fee for the breached part in accordance with the relevant provisions of the travel contract.
Another: This clerical error by the travel agency is a low-level mistake or is suspected of deliberately confusing the concept, and it is necessary to apologize to the guest for this!
- Related articles
- Cyberpunk 2077 guide: Which are the latest six major areas and are the most complete and detailed explanation of the six major areas?
- What scenic spots are there in Anqing?
- Shopping guide for Cheung Sha Wan Plaza Shopping mall near Changsha
- Similarities and Differences in the Process of Travel Accommodation Platform Websites and Hotel Self-Built Websites
- Where to go for a spring outing? Why?
- What are the interesting places in Hangzhou?
- When applying for a tourist visa to the United States, you should bring your academic credentials with you during the interview. Do you have your diploma?
- How to travel to Chiang Mai, Thailand by bus?
- What are the tourist attractions around Putian?
- Tourism Geography According to statistics from the National Holiday Office, the number of people traveling during the Golden Week during the Spring Festival in 2013 exceeded 200 million for the first