Some people say that children are still young, so it is meaningless to take them out to travel. Do you agree with this statement?

Many times parents are reluctant to take their young babies out to play, even in the suburbs. The reason is that the baby can't remember and the parents are too tired.

With the continuous development and progress of society, people's living standards and parenting concepts have also been greatly improved. More and more parents are willing to take their children out on holidays and weekends, so that they can see more about the outside world.

I think it's best for Ma Bao not to take children out when they are less than 1 year old, because after all, children are still young, and when they go to tourist attractions, adults will take turns to hold them. If the baby wears thick clothes in winter, it will be very tired to hold it. Even if two people take turns holding the baby, it will be unbearable for a long time.

Children have their own way of thinking after they are two years old, and their interest in new things is relatively high. At the same time, the most important thing is that children of this age like to walk by themselves and don't need their parents' hugs at all. When going out to play, parents only need to hold their children's hands and tell them historical stories of scenic spots and the like.

Taking children out for a trip does have many benefits, not only broadening their horizons, but also allowing them to exercise. More importantly, it can also enhance the affection between parents and children and make children's childhood happier.

So I don't think it's a question of whether it's meaningful to take a child to travel when he is young, but whether parents can take good care of him. If you really can't take care of it, you don't have to. If your child eats well and sleeps well, you can start with a short trip and take your baby to see the world together!