Is it necessary to upgrade Nikon D750 to Nikon Z6 II?

Is it necessary to upgrade Nikon D750 to Nikon Z6 II?

1, the theme determines the equipment

Some friends often ask questions such as "should we upgrade the camera body and lens", but these questions generally ignore our own shooting situation.

This is obviously putting the cart before the horse!

The correct thinking should be what subject matter you shoot, what requirements your subject matter has for your equipment, and then consider whether to upgrade the equipment. Take the topic as an example. If most of your shots are landscapes, travel notes and flowers, replacing D750 with Z6 II will not improve your film quality or your experience.

On the other hand, if you often shoot portraits with a large aperture (from the current equipment of the subject, this probability is not too great), then upgrading the micro-camera, coupled with the new lens of Nikon Z-mount, will have a very obvious effect.

2. Brother Mouse's personal suggestion is:

Keep using the D750 set without upgrading.

If you want to upgrade, it is recommended to completely remove the D750. Among Nikon's new Z-mount lenses, I recommend three 35/50/85 1.8 "Legions". In addition, if there are not many moving targets in the theme, you can also consider Nikon Z5 and spend the money saved on the lens.

Finally, we have experienced and evaluated Nikon's Z7, Z50mm f/ 1.8S lens, Z 14-30 lens and Z70-200S lens. Please read it for your reference.

Overwhelming the crowd? Old wine in new bottles? Trial experience of Nikon Z70-200S lens.

Lens reflecting the superiority of Z-mount, Nikon Z14-30 mm f/4.0s.

It takes ten years to grind a sword, and the sword is ground into a needle? Comments on Nikon Z50mm f/ 1.8S lens

Do you think a Canon fan rated Nikon Z7 camera as "reliable"?

It's not necessary. If you enter the z62, then the F-set is worthless, and the reform is tantamount to killing people. You can buy it back at a discount of 4.5% for second-hand goods. Z-port has another 30 thousand.

I don't think it's necessary! The picture quality of SLR is no worse than that of micro-single! If you want to shoot a video, it should be a micro-single. If you take pictures, your things will be enough, which will last for several years! I think there is still a lot of toothpaste to squeeze in the micro-sheet. The lens is not cost-effective, it is too expensive!

Both D750 and Z62 are full-frame cameras with the level of 20 million pixels, and the photographing effect is very good, but the operation experience of photographing is slightly different. For example, back screen focusing, human eye focusing and other functions will completely change our photo habits, but the image quality has not been improved, that's all.

Perhaps the difference in camera operation is enough for you to choose to upgrade the Z62, but personally, I value the results more, and the substantial improvement in image quality is what I care about. If you want to upgrade, I suggest choosing high-resolution reflective or SLR. D850 or Z7-2 is your dish.

However, although it represents the trend of the times, its growth is still worth looking forward to, especially its lens. But at present, the Z-mount lens still focuses on 1.4 zoom 2.8, and its road is still very long.

I am also a D750 player, and my choice is to wait and see.

have