Thesis Defense Comments

1. In a five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for it, showing a certain understanding of the problem being studied. The video design is beautiful, but it does not meet professional requirements. It would be better if the implementation process was designed from a computer professional perspective.

2. The student fluently stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of writing the paper. The antique website design process is very standardized, but there is little connection between entities and concepts. The entire design should try to comply with computer aspects. Require.

3. The student makes clear statements and answers questions fluently. Although the concept of the paper is good and has certain research value, the structure and content are relatively large and require strong independent research capabilities. The title of the paper and the client login server module also need to be slightly modified. The student has made sufficient preparations, complete the presentation of the link, and has a clear conception of the paper, which reflects a good professional foundation and good time management. That is, there are needs in the paper but there is a lack of need analysis, the answers to some defense questions are not clear, and the representation of the diagram is not standardized.

4. The student used technologies such as dreamweave and access database to design the Ganzi tourism website. The design is fresh and beautiful, the main questions are answered accurately, and the basic concepts are clear. I hope to modify the database storage issues corrected in the paper.

5. The student has relatively good professionalism, can answer the questions fluently, has a high accuracy rate, has a good understanding of the difficulties encountered in the implementation process, and has a good grasp of time. If he can use a relatively new operating environment It's relatively good to implement.

6. The student explained the design details of the database in detail, conducted in-depth research, completed the forum design part independently, had certain scientific research capabilities, had clear ideas in the defense, answered concisely, and spoke fluently. After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed that the student’s score was good, but required the student to correct some remaining errors in the paper.

7. In the ten-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, as well as the writing process of the paper. The student was clearly organized and had no major mistakes in language. He responded to the teacher’s questions. Basically correct answers reflect a certain degree of professionalism. However, there is a slight problem in the design process, and the flow chart is not very complete. I hope it will be corrected in time.

8. From the defense, it can be seen that the student has a solid professional foundation in general, sufficient preparation, is very familiar with the content of the paper, can state the design ideas and processes concisely and clearly, can present the system fluently, and answers questions rationally. According to the data, the basic concepts are clear and the paper has certain innovations. I hope to continue to improve some of the words and symbols in the paper and strive to standardize their use.

9. The student can explain the main content of the paper relatively fluently and clearly within the specified time, can appropriately answer questions related to the paper, has a humble attitude, and reflects a relatively solid computer foundation. It is recommended to express the image opening function in appropriate words and continue to improve and standardize the format of the paper.

10. Combine mathematical knowledge with computer technology to deal with geological problems, have a thorough grasp of method principles, and have relatively good innovations in the paper. The results of fast Fourier and wavelet transform diagrams are well analyzed, the processing results are good, and the basic computer literacy is good. The main questions in the defense were answered accurately and in depth. It would be better if the transformation indicators in the paper are compared.

11. The thesis statement is clear and the explanation is simple and clear. The shortcoming is that it lacks its own new ideas and methods, and mostly applies other people’s research results. The format of the paper should be more standardized.

12. The preparation for the defense is sufficient, the teacher’s questions can be answered in detail, and the difficulties encountered in the design process can be repeatedly discussed and studied to find better solutions, and the professional skills are relatively good. It would be better if it could be combined with professional improvements to make static web pages dynamic. The disadvantage is that the description of the tables in the database is not quite right, and we hope to improve it.

13. The thesis statement is clear, straight to the point, and goes directly to the topic. I can answer the teacher's questions fluently and have clear ideas. However, I cannot explain part of the code in the paper clearly and there are a few language errors. I hope to be more innovative in future research.

14. The student can state the main content of the thesis within the specified time, but the answers to the questions during the defense are not very fluent, he is not familiar with the details of the design technology, and the answers to the questions are not relevant enough.

15. Expound the thesis from five parts, highlight the key points, defend fluently and proficiently, master the knowledge basically in place, and meet the time requirements. The disadvantage is that there are some conceptual errors in the paper.

16. During the defense process, the student can skillfully and concisely state the main content of the paper within the specified time, with clear organization and obvious innovation points, quick response when answering questions, accurate expression, and skillful system demonstration. His professional quality is very high. After discussion by the defense committee, it was unanimously agreed that his performance was excellent.