I always do what everyone else does, eat and sleep,...but I can't learn to pretend in other people's mouth,

I always do what everyone else does, eat and sleep,... but I can’t learn the pretense that others say,

The word: reading ten thousand books in large, medium and small means reading If you repeat reading, won’t you be able to apply what you have learned? Based on the opponent's arbitrary assertion, can we also conclude that traveling thousands of miles means traveling again and again, and those who don't know how to read are all illiterate? I saw the opposing side added an explanation on the 67th floor - those who are not illiterate Tianya have already made a self-denial.

I have already said that reading and traveling are different ways to acquire knowledge. If you want to achieve anything, you must first read thousands of books, and theory must guide practice. Please friends who are on the opposite side, in addition to walking with your head down, you should also give me face and read what I have written, and don't use any arbitrary methods to prevent us scholars from doing things.

Opposition point of view (2) Knowledge comes from the world of experience.

Refutation: Since what we are debating is the relationship between reading and traveling, rather than the question of whose mother is the book or the road, the knowledge and experience argument put forward by the opponent is based on wrong interpretation of the question and deviates from the debate. , meaningless. Here I will make a point of explanation: Books are indeed a summary of practitioners’ experiences. The first book may have been conceived after traveling thousands of miles, but after long years of development and accumulation of human beings, in modern society, there are many people who have read thousands of books and practiced Wanli Road gives you a choice, how do you choose?

Books are written by people who have traveled thousands of miles. Why should we write books and biographies? Isn’t it just to spread experience and prevent future generations from taking wrong paths and detours? The importance of incorrect instructions can be compared to road signs.

Opposition point of view (3) The order formed spontaneously in the world for thousands of years is the most precise and natural. Its existence is not the result of the guidance of "theory". The existence of theory only explains the world and has limited effect.

Refutation: Human beings have a very powerful ability to transform the world in practice. It is precisely the blind practical behavior of people who do not master the theoretical knowledge of environmental protection that has led to the current deterioration of the environment. China has put forward requirements for local leaders at all levels to learn from foreign sustainable development theories, pay attention to environmental protection, and ensure sustainable economic development. At present, some cities have been re-planned and have basically achieved sustainable economic development, with beautiful environments and people living and working in peace and contentment. However, some places are still blindly engaging in economic development, over-resources, continuous floods and landslides, industrial pollution, increasing urban pollution, a vicious circle, and people's living and production conditions are deteriorating day by day, with very serious consequences.

3. Summarize the arguments of the opposing side to refute our point of view

Opposing arguments (1) Traveling thousands of miles can obtain more, better, more truly, profoundly and extensively than reading thousands of books Knowledge.

Refutation: First, Xiang Mingyue proposed that "film and television means do not belong to the category of reading, but are more likely to be another way of traveling thousands of miles." It is better to simply say that reading thousands of books is also another way of traveling. Wanli Road is better.

I reiterate again, "In modern society, the carrier of knowledge is no longer just printed matter, but television, radio, and especially the computer network called the information highway."

" Traveling thousands of miles is a way to directly gain experience by trying and practicing; reading thousands of books is a way to indirectly gain experience by studying and learning from the experiences summarized by others." If the opposing debaters have any objections, please explain. Returning to the topic, the counter-argument is that people learn from reading and have physical obstacles such as being unable to memorize, read, and memorize rote texts. The knowledge in the world is as vast as the sea, just as it is impossible for people to travel all over the world and do things for all mankind. As long as you master the knowledge you need, do what you can. Except for the problem of not being able to remember, not being able to read, and memorizing books, you can't overcome them. But what are the biggest physiological barriers to human practice? It’s short-lived!

Do you dare not to read or learn the books that predecessors summarized in their lives, but to practice them again in your limited life?

The ancients said, "It is better to believe in books than to have no books", not "to believe in books, it is better to have no books". "Exerting" means not to be completely and absolutely dependent. In fact, it is the same not only in reading, but also in anything. In practice, there are times when you will reach a dead end - "What you learn on paper will only be shallow in the end, but you must do it in detail." It is unrealistic, and life is limited, which does not allow us to do everything by hand; the killing of intellectuals cannot prove that "reading can make people intellectual, but not learning can't be a good person." The fact is that the lower the education level, the higher the crime rate. Opposition argument (2) It is wrong to read ten thousand books before you can successfully travel ten thousand miles. Traveling ten thousand miles can better enable people to successfully travel the next ten thousand miles than reading ten thousand books.

Refutation: (1) Xiang Mingyue must be a good girl who likes to make cakes, but I want to know whether Xiang Mingyue directly figured out how to make cakes by herself or learned it indirectly from recipes, TV, or other people's mouths of. From the correct selection and correct processing of various food raw materials such as grains, birds and animals, vegetables and fruits, baking soda, to the correct choice of cooking methods such as frying, stir-frying, braising, boiling and stewing, it is necessary to learn basic knowledge first and then practice. It is better to explore and experiment by yourself, it goes without saying - self-evident.

If Xiang Mingyue is a genius and can surpass the thousands of years of human food development history and make his own cake, even if it is a delicious sweet potato cake, it will take most of your life. You still have life and energy to make it. Invented the egg tart?

(2) Regarding our point of view that “you must first read thousands of books before you can travel thousands of miles successfully”, MANSTEIN’s speech on the 67th floor also fully proved our point of view. The excerpt is as follows:

MANSTEIN: "It is precisely because of the existence of these books and the teachings of teachers that I have been able to accumulate knowledge at a very fast speed. After one year of junior high school education, the effect is definitely It is much better than the thousands of years of practice of the ancients. Not only do we not deny this, but we also vigorously encourage everyone to receive school education in order to fill their brains with knowledge and rationality. ”

Before planning to investigate the tax issues of farmers in Guangxi, MANSTEIN carefully read "Finance and Taxation in Ming Dynasty China in the Sixteenth Century" and reviewed the tax laws of the past dynasties dating back to the Qin and Han dynasties. Only when you are ready do you go out for an on-site inspection -. (3) Xiao Xiaotong said on the 71st floor: "Newton often said, don't think how great I am. I am standing on the shoulders of giants. What are the shoulders of this giant?" It is your unswerving determination. Isn’t it a theory that is persistently pursued? It is the careful observation of countless great astronomers like “Copernicus and Bruno”; it is the panoramic view of the earth marked by great navigators such as “Columbus and Magellan”; it is the result of countless great scientific pioneers. -The result of practitioners rushing to the "new frontier" (new

frontier) in various fields of scientific research!"

Opposition debaters often cite examples of scientists to illustrate that the shoulders of giants are not "Ten thousand books". When Newton was studying apples, how did he come into contact with other scientific theories, or the great achievements of other scientists? Copernicus, Buono, Columbus, Magellan and others brought them with them Newton looked at the stars and the moon together, and crossed the sea together? Isn't it indirectly transmitted to Newton through the great works they left behind?

3. It is recommended that the opposing party clearly understands the concepts and viewpoints of our argument and accurately puts forward its own arguments. I don’t mention my own arguments, I just start with a vague “not as good as”, and I take it as far as I can go. At the same time, I don’t look at the other party’s arguments, I don’t refute my own arguments, I just focus on some examples that I can’t figure out what problem I want to explain. It's a bit of a wild debate. Haha, from such a big debate topic, in the end, the other debater could only use the "words and words" of reading! All the verbs, nouns, and "end" annotations are out! Why is the topic of this debate set as: Traveling thousands of miles is worse than reading ten thousand books VS Reading - Tens of thousands of books is not as good as traveling thousands of miles

Instead of the debate topic repeatedly emphasized by the opponent: the number of direct ways to obtain knowledge VS* **indirect***?

If even this level of debate is wrong, how can we win? Of course, gaining knowledge is a small part of this debate topic. How could the other debater use such a small part as the definition of the topic?

There are too many repeated topics, so I won’t repeat them here. I want to ask my fellow debater, what is the purpose of studying? Is it to gain knowledge and experience? What is the purpose of gaining knowledge and experience? Does it finally come down to “use”? That is to say - "learn to apply". From this we can see that the most fundamental and important thing is "use", that is, practice. On this basis, we also encourage reading more and standing on the shoulders of giants to practice to open the way. Unexpectedly, the other debater interpreted it as "practice". -I agree with his argument that it is better to read thousands of books than to travel thousands of miles. What is the logic of this? At the beginning, I was reminded not to look at the problem in isolation. When the issue was not isolated, the other party came up with an unknown "copycat", which is ridiculous!

Another point that is even more puzzling is that we never saw any doubts raised by our opponent's arguments at the beginning. Instead, we debated on the basis of this argument until it was unfounded. It is advisable that when the debate is about to end, the opponent's fellow debater comes out with the most fundamental denial. What kind of logic is this?

The opposition debaters finally understood that our debate topic is actually based on "not as good as". This is very good. The ancients said, "If you hear the truth in the morning, you will die in the evening." It is better to admit defeat now. There's enough time.

We know that humans exist in the world through practical actions. For example, if we want to eat, sleep, walk, work, or experience, these troublesome things must be done in person. Do it, no one can do it for you. Therefore, it can indeed be said that "traveling thousands of miles" is the basic condition for human beings. In this sense, the opposing debaters thought they were right.

Although it is impossible for us to survive without practice. However, I want to emphasize two points here. First, as human beings, we have to consider how to develop, not only for individuals, but also for society. We need to make progress.

People-, how do humans progress? According to the experience revealed in the history of knowledge dissemination, in ancient times, an individual, group or organization that had mastered advanced skills and concepts would inevitably have a more advantageous position and obtain more advantages than other individuals, groups or organizations in the process of social evolution. multiple interests; then, this individual, collective, or organization that has mastered advanced skills and concepts spreads their skills and concepts through practical actions such as war, trade, preaching, etc.; while other individuals, collectives, or organizations After comparison and screening, we slowly accepted this advanced skill and concept. As a result, knowledge that is more conducive to people and human evolution can be popularized. With the development of human society in recent times, the spread of knowledge is no longer limited to specific practical behaviors. We can now learn advanced knowledge through various information carriers including books. Of course, personal practice - "traveling thousands of miles" - is still one of the effective ways to obtain knowledge, but you have to admit that the emergence of books has greatly broadened human horizons, allowing humans to jump beyond what they see. The resulting narrow experience frame can absorb advanced knowledge more broadly and quickly, and thus be better able to keep up with the development of the times. This is why printing is called one of the greatest inventions. Therefore, we can say that when human beings were still in the ignorant stage, practice - "traveling thousands of miles" - was more important than "reading thousands of books", but when knowledge is created and summarized in the form of books When the time comes, it must be considered a wise move to first obtain greater knowledge from books to guide practical behavior.

Second, let’s consider our debate topic on specific individuals in real society. From a general perspective, the opposing debaters think whether it is “reading thousands of books” or “traveling thousands of miles.” "Is it more conducive to improving one's status in society? -The answer should be self-explanatory. We have been taught since childhood that "the more you study, the more you will live a good life." I believe you have heard a lot of lessons like this from the opposing debaters, right? If you don't study hard and want to go out and explore the world and "travel thousands of miles", you are guaranteed to have your parents twist your ears and punch you in the face - hey, what a wise parent! I can give you an example. For example, Mr. Li Ka-shing, who is the richest Chinese man in the world. The fact that everyone knows is that he did not study many books when he was a child. He relied on his own hard work to create such a brilliant career. However, when he was interviewed by Satellite TV, Mr. Li told the truth: "I didn't study much when I was a child, so now I read books whenever I have free time. When I was doing plastic surgery, I used to study by myself while holding books; now I basically read more than a dozen books a month." There are books on finance, business management, and literature. It is very useful to learn the experience of managing a company from others. "I remember a similar example from a vice president of Tsinghua Tongfang (the specific name is mine). Can’t remember clearly, female), the number of books she read per month was “4”. These examples are very useful in enlightening the paranoid thinking of the opposing debaters, that is, - running a business is of course a practical matter, but whether it is done well or not ultimately depends on reading and gaining broader knowledge from books. What's more, to borrow the words of the opposing party Stein

, Li Ka-shing is a hero in the ordinary world, but "most of us are real mortals, living above the ground." I thought If you want to live a better life, you should honestly read a good book first!

Having said this, I suddenly thought that there is a ready-made example here, that is, Mr. nstein on the other side.

The profound knowledge he displayed in the debate really made me look forward to it. I admire you, but do you think he came to debate with us after personally practicing and consulting Wang Mang, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Kant and other sages? Or have you experienced many major events in history to be able to say so many things? No! It’s not knowledge found in books! If the opposing side wins this debate, it can prove that the role of "reading thousands of books" is much greater than the role of "practicing" ("traveling thousands of miles") as we are here to spit out stars and fly around. Of course, everyone on the opposing side seems to be well-educated but not very experienced people. You should know that what we debate here is basically based on the knowledge gained from books, not practice; practice is just typing on the keyboard. action. As for Mr. nstein's joke - "Even if I don't know who built the Great Wall, when I stand on the Great Wall, my sense of history will emerge" - don't mention it Whatever. Ha ha!

The above is the argument below; let’s refute the arguments and argumentation logic cited by the opponent.

nstein believes that Wang Mang was defeated and killed because he had a rigid mind and read too many rote books. Some of the economic systems established by "Wang Mang's restructuring" must have been effective, otherwise many achievements would not have been achieved. Continuing, there is no need for me to say more about this historical fact. Just saying that he was defeated and killed, is it because "a scholar cannot succeed after all"? Obviously not; his act of usurping the Han Dynasty was despised by the orthodox intellectuals at that time. How can we say that he is "an out-and-out corrupt Confucian"? To put it bluntly, it seems that it is not because he has read too many books, but because he has not read enough books and failed to assess the situation and find out what people's hearts are that leads to his ruined reputation. Of course, you cannot judge heroes based on their knowledge. Real scholars are definitely not those in power and can be powerful.

However, there are many examples of academic scholars who have influenced the operation of real society through their academic theories: such as Rousseau to the French Revolution, Adam Smith to the capitalist market economy, and so-and-so to the current United States. Neoconservatism (I haven’t read much, and I forgot his name).

nstein also said, "The order that has been formed spontaneously in the world for thousands of years is the most precise and natural, and its existence is not the result of the guidance of 'theory'." Of course I admit that. However, if we are familiar with the development process of human history, we can know that the world has been built like this for thousands of years, but it definitely did not form spontaneously. There will always be some self-righteous guys in human beings who try to control everything! As a result, human life was devastated, the country was destroyed and people were destroyed. I don't care if I don't mention this case, everyone knows it. At this time, the role of classical theory is reflected. It is not responsible for planning and guiding the execution of this world, but explaining what is the most effective way of execution. So we know that what we thought was right is actually absurd and extremely sinful. If we still adhere to the practical argument of "fighting against heaven and earth and fighting against people" and the idealism of "how bold and bold people are, how rich the land is" - instead of looking at the world and looking for the truth from classic books, then, What will become of us?

Kant is a classic example of how "reading thousands of books" is more useful than "traveling thousands of miles", but nstein misinterpreted him as an example of the opposite - such a confusion of right and wrong, and nonsense. It's an insult to politeness!

In my opinion, the argument presented by the opposing debater Xiang Mingyue

is the most brilliant part. But he has forgotten the most fundamental thing, "What you learn on paper will only make sense, and you must practice it if you know it." It is true, but it is necessary to first get a view on the general knowledge laws of the world from paper - He who “does it” in order to “know this matter”! Here, what is “obtained on paper” still plays a guiding role.

Finally, let me use another old saying that is familiar to us Chinese to educate the opposition debaters -

"Those who work hard govern others, and those who work hard govern others"!

The so-called "workers" are mostly people who study; and the "laborers" are basically loyal fans who "travel thousands of miles" like the opposition debate friends. Although this old saying about China sounds uncomfortable and has a bit of a class-struggle flavor, it has been transformed for so many years, but it is still a fact after all...

Well, the nuclear bomb has finally been launched, okay!

Originally, I was exploring the meaning of the word "empty" in Buddhism, and was preparing to deal with the fairy level.

Suddenly I heard a loud noise, and I saw that it was Brother Shitou's nuclear bomb!

If you look closely, you have to applaud this text that quotes scriptures, carefully polishes it, learns from the past and the present, and expresses it freely! It can be seen that he has indeed read thousands of books - he came prepared.

Using daily actions to illustrate practice, a "practice" that is separated from books, is indeed a new "Tao", but I heard "Tao" in the evening, how can I deserve your words? Where are the ancients?

The opponent’s friend Roman Stone

On the 91st floor, he talked about the history of the dissemination of knowledge at the beginning, and the opponent’s friend mentioned the meaning of the debate at the beginning: acquisition The effective way of knowledge is the same as exit and withdrawal. At this point, I would like to use an analogy to ask my fellow debaters: When everyone is discussing the comprehensive teaching development of a school, some people only discuss one class in the school, and limit and target all the situations of the school. Let’s discuss it in this class to summarize the comprehensive problems of the school. Think about it, put the whole school into the class, instead of putting the class within the scope of the school, what kind of logic is this? What kind of theory is this? Should the opposing debater carefully understand this topic?

Speaking of the second point, can you read the current Li Ka-shing? cannot! Are there fewer people who read more than Li Ka-shing? Quite a few! But why is it not as successful as Li Ka-shing? The other party asked my debate friend, can you tell me? At this point, the other debater has also admitted that what we are debating is the "inferiority" between reading thousands of books and traveling thousands of miles. In this sense, does it mean that we are debating which one is more important? We are not alone in saying that there is no need to study. We just argue that practice (traveling thousands of miles) is more important than studying. During practice, we should return to books to enrich ourselves. Does this mean that studying is more important than practice? It is possible to gain knowledge from books, but is it as good as practice? Furthermore, use this debate to illustrate the win-lose situation between studying and traveling thousands of miles? Has the other party’s debater read too much?

Finally, I would like to add another refutation to the argument about Roman stones.

First of all, I would like to say that if the other debater regards the scholar we mentioned above as Studying to death, studying to death; then what the opponent's fellow debater said later, "life is in ruins, the country is destroyed and people are destroyed" is following the old path before - meaning - a kind of blind work? I won’t mention this anymore, and let’s talk about what the stone said: Rousseau is to the French Revolution, Adam Smith is to the capitalist field economy, and it does not say whether the theory came first or was formed from the practice of revolution and field economy. theory-.

I want to ask my fellow debater: Which theory is important? Or is practice important? Would there be a great revolution without practice? Would there be an on-site economy without practice? These real revolutions and market economies are actually reflected in practice! Returning to the question raised above, why study? The ultimate solution is to "apply what you have learned", which means that "application" is the most important thing. Practice, fellow debater of the other party!

If the negative side wins this debate, it can prove that the effect of "reading thousands of books" is actually better than what we are here to "practice" ("travel thousands of miles"). Much more effective.

As for what the other debater said is not an appropriate metaphor and actually means typing on the keyboard, I would like to ask the other debater: If you don’t type on the keyboard in this debate, even if you have Full of classics,

As for your sentence - "Can you read the current Li Ka-shing? No! Are there fewer people who have read more than Li Ka-shing? Quite a few! But why are they not as accomplished as Li Ka-shing? ?”

In fact, if you put it in another word, you will find that it is useless to simply use Li Ka-shing to explain the matter. He will not help anyone. Change it to this -

"Can Li Ka-shing be the current Li Ka-shing in business (practice)? No! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Few! But why are there not as successful as Li Ka-shing?"

Judging from the general situation in society, you have to admit that "reading thousands of books" has a more obvious and effective effect on improving a person's quality in all aspects.

So, the other party thinks that reading thousands of books is compared with typing on the keyboard. Do you think this is appropriate?

Let’s talk about this formula again:

“Can we become the Li Ka-shing we are today in business (practice)? No! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Quite a few! But Why is it not as successful as Li Ka-shing? ”

Judging from the general situation in society, you have to admit that “reading thousands of books” has a more obvious and effective effect on improving a person’s quality in all aspects.

So, the other party thinks that reading thousands of books is compared with typing on the keyboard. Do you think this is appropriate?

Let’s talk about this formula again:

“Can we become the Li Ka-shing we are today in business (practice)? No! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Quite a few! But Why is it not as successful as Li Ka-shing? ”

Didn’t Li Ka-shing succeed through practice? Why are many businessmen not as successful as Li Ka-shing? Can this situation be overcome by lack of practice? Of course, simply talking about Li Ka-shing can't explain anything. The other debater may ask the question above, using a lack of education to explain that many businessmen are not as successful as Li Ka-shing. Yes, the problems are so diverse and multifaceted! But when it comes to the ultimate nature of reading, it is for "use", and the focus is on use. Doesn't that mean that traveling thousands of miles is not more important than reading thousands of books?

I don’t know if the following words are of a debate nature. I’m already dizzy. It’s not a bad idea to call it a discussion!

I also understood from the beginning that the focus of this debate is actually "inferior"; then, in what problem categories do the two have comparative significance? I have been asking myself this question? Since the topic is "traveling thousands of miles is worse than reading ten thousand books" - VS reading ten thousand books is not as good as traveling ten thousand miles, I think the debate should be about "traveling thousands of miles" and "reading ten thousand books", rather than one of the fulcrums. If the debate is to acquire knowledge and travel thousands of miles, it is better to read ten thousand books VS to acquire knowledge and read thousands of books - it is better to travel thousands of miles. There is no doubt that the topic of the debate mentioned by the other party is correct. So under such a big debate topic, how to debate and compare? Should we be looking for sexual comparison? I focus more on evidence-based arguments from both sides, rather than arguing on a certain point! I wonder if the other debater thinks this is true? Take a look at the debate topic of Prosperity of the Nation and Strength of the People vs. Prosperity of the People and a Strong Nation on the Hongdou debate stage in the early stage. Are they looking for a point to debate? It’s about getting evidence to demonstrate and arguing based on reason! Let’s go back to the affirmative debater - one of the relatively limited problem categories of evidence. If we set this category as follows: "Reading thousands of books" and "traveling thousands of miles" are both for human beings to achieve innovation (thus enabling human beings to perfect and development), so what do the affirmative debaters think of this issue?

Regarding what the other debater said: Only by clarifying the above issues that need to be analyzed can we have a clear target. Indeed, I understand the issues being analyzed, but I always feel that the nature of the issues is more biased towards my own position. Just look at the above paragraph - The thoughts of various schools of thought during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods interacted and influenced each other in each period. Among them, Confucianism, which occupies the dominant ideological system in our country, has gained a dominant position in its opposite sex? otherwise!

The same is true for the comparison between "reading thousands of books" and "traveling thousands of miles". Roman Stone, the other party's debate friend, said: If we debate whether "reading thousands of books" or "traveling thousands of miles" is more useful, then we, the affirmative, will be totally confused and unable to argue.

Is this true? If we debate which function is greater, "reading thousands of books" or "traveling thousands of miles", will we and the other side be absolutely stunned? Is there any way to argue? I hope my fellow debaters on the other side will give me some advice on this point?

I don’t want to say any more about the roundabout topic! Looking at the debate, "learning" is somewhat of a self-absorbed nature (obtaining knowledge), while "use" is a feeling of reaching the world (creating benefits). What kind of "inferior" is there for the big and the small? it goes without saying.

Although I have been stunned by the other party’s long speech, since I have signed up for the competition, I must finish it from beginning to end. Forget it, let’s just bite the bullet and let our eyes suffer some more.

At this point in the debate, as the affirmative, you have not even given a basic argument. Therefore, although you have fought from the cold weapon age to modern warfare, from fists and kung fu dances to hidden weapons with darts, from machine guns to mortars, and finally, you even used nuclear weapons. However, none of these did any harm to us. Haha

Let’s get back to the topic, both of you and I have reached a consensus in our previous speeches: traveling thousands of miles and reading thousands of books are both effective ways to master knowledge and are indispensable. Now, our disagreement lies in who is "inferior" to whom.

There is a saying in China: It is a horse or a mule that pulls it around. To know how to compete in a 100-meter race, you need to first mark out the track, set the rules, find a referee, and then take over the open frame running. So, in this debate, where is the runway drawn by the affirmative? Where are the rules? Unfortunately, I haven't seen it so far.

We have repeatedly mentioned in the previous debate that this debate is about which of the two methods is stronger, deeper and more effective in the process of mastering knowledge. Instead of using these two methods to grasp the amount of knowledge.

Since we want to compare, of course it is under the premise that both methods exist. For example, in swimming, we can first read a lot of theoretical books and then rush into the water to try our skills. You can also listen to the instructor explain the essentials and then experience it yourself in the water. Also give two days to see who learns faster. In this case, it will be clear at a glance which of the two methods is better.

We believe that, provided both methods are feasible, traveling thousands of miles is a more effective way to master knowledge than reading thousands of books.

First of all, traveling thousands of miles is a personal practice and experience, so it can give the brain direct stimulation. What people gain in this process is a direct feeling of knowledge. Therefore, this knowledge is often learned more solidly and can be taken out for personal use anytime and anywhere. The knowledge obtained from books is relatively superficial and lacks rational understanding. It is precisely for this reason that we often say that reading should not require a thorough understanding, but wait until you experience it in practice. Therefore, the quality of knowledge obtained by traveling thousands of miles is far greater than that of reading thousands of books. Secondly, the knowledge gained from traveling thousands of miles comes from personal experience, while the knowledge in books comes from the experience of predecessors. As the saying goes, seeing is what we see and what we hear is false. This is because the knowledge gained by traveling thousands of miles is more true and reliable;

Thirdly, traveling thousands of miles makes it easier to discover problems and invent new ones on this basis. Knowledge. We all know that many important discoveries are discovered accidentally during experiments.

The other debater mentioned medicine earlier. I would like to ask the other party, why do undergraduates in clinical medicine have to study for five years? Isn't it to increase clinical internship time and master knowledge through personal experience? Without sufficient training, who would dare to let him use a knife on his belly? Nowadays, powerful universities are applying to join the 211 Project. To meet this requirement, in addition to dropping a few more boxes of books into the library, perhaps the most important thing is to purchase experimental equipment, build experimental buildings and internship bases, right? Why do China's top scientists want the United States? In addition to the better economic benefits the United States can provide, the more important thing is that the experimental equipment of American scientific research institutions is better! These all prove from the side that practice is more important than theory!

Having said all this, the other debater will definitely ask: Since traveling thousands of miles is better than reading thousands of books, why do most people choose to read thousands of books at home instead of going out and traveling thousands of miles? ? We believe that if we don’t want to do it, we really can’t do it! As we all know, due to limitations of time, economy, and energy, it is impossible for people to truly travel thousands of miles. If there were no time or financial constraints, I think everyone would be willing to personally experience the knowledge they have learned. Today, as television and the Internet become increasingly developed, why are more and more people choosing to travel? Knowing that traveling is tiring, why do so many people go to tourist attractions to suffer on May Day and National Day? Isn't this a great example? Take your time and watch! There are pros and cons! Why do I always fail to do things that others tell me to do?

Be confident! It’s no big deal, if you can’t do it well, you can’t do it well! The more you do it, the more you'll become familiar with it. Come on! I always don’t want to do things that others do, or go too far, but I always don’t know how to say it

Just like liking music and painting, you may know beauty but you may not be able to create it. My personal ability has not yet reached that level. There are many people who don’t understand me, so they always do things that hurt me, and I always forgive them.

You are very kind, and the roses you give to others have lingering fragrance in your hands. I believe If you hurt others, you will hurt yourself.

Since hurting you must also hurt yourself, think about it from another angle. Maybe she hurt you and you hurt her. How can you treat the you who hurt her? It's easy to do this by comparing your heart to your heart. Knowing that forgiveness is a great thing, what should I do if I can't always do what I want to do?

Willingness needs to be tempered slowly,

Please tell me about eating. If you only have 100 yuan per person

According to what you said, a bowl of noodles costs 7.8 yuan, so what kind of Chinese food can you get?

If you want me, first buy 10 packs of Laotan pickled cabbage instant noodles. The packaged price is 2.2 yuan per pack, which is 22 yuan. One pack a day, which is 58 yuan.

You can go to the supermarket to buy some bread. There are several loaves of bread for 4 yuan. I believe you won’t finish it in one meal. You can drink it with milk. This can last for a few days.

Then you can have some meals.

Also, you can also give others a few slaps, but you have to pay for it. What are the things you can do, and force others to do things that others can't do

There are a lot of...my own physical things...my own special household chores. Animals also do them while sleeping, eating, and walking

Why do frogs feel that things done by others are meaningless?

Because you don’t meet anyone around you who lives a relatively successful life according to your living standards. In other words, you think you are surrounded by mediocre people. But there is a saying that birds of a feather flock together, I forgot what the next sentence is. Push yourself and move forward.

What will happen if you force others to do things they don’t like?

Others will annoy you