1,000-word graduation thesis on college general theory

The Mao Zedong course is a compulsory course for college students, and we college students must pay attention to it. The following is a 1,000-word paper on Mao Zedong University's Mao Zedong Theory that I compiled for you. Welcome to read it!

A 1,000-word paper on Mao Zedong University's Mao Zedong Thought: "A Brief Analysis of the Evolution of U.S. Global Strategy after the Cold War"

< p> Abstract: This article mainly briefly describes the adjustment and evolution of U.S. global strategy after the end of the Cold War.

Keywords: Cold War, U.S. Global Strategy

With the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Cold War also came to an end. After that, the United States became the only superpower in the world. With the development of the new economy of the United States in the 1990s, the continuous improvement of comprehensive national strength, and the further strengthening of its relative strategic advantage, the United States also actively adjusted its global strategy accordingly. From the end of the Cold War to the present, the U.S.’s global strategy has roughly gone through the Clinton administration, the George W. Bush administration, and now the Obama administration. Although the U.S.’s global strategies in these periods each have their own distinct characteristics, their global The core content of the strategy has never changed, which is to achieve American leadership in the world.

1. Clinton administration period (1993-2001): The "engagement and expansion" strategy was launched shortly after the end of the Cold War, in order to ensure the "economic security" of the United States and respond to post-Cold War threats and ensure In order to maintain the world leadership of the United States, the Clinton administration formally proposed the "engagement and expansion" strategy in July 1994. This is the first global strategy of the United States after the Cold War. Its main contents are:

1. In politics On the topic, it is proposed to expand Western democracy and promote the transformation of countries of great strategic significance to Western democratic systems; consolidate the "new" democratic regimes in the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Latin American countries; actively promote "one superpower doctrine"; prevent any regional emerging The rise of great powers to challenge the global interests of the United States, etc.

2. Economically, raise the development of the U.S. economy to the height of its global strategic status and promote "economic diplomacy"; strengthen strategic connections and policy coordination among original allies; promote global economic liberalization ; From a strategic perspective, it is proposed to occupy emerging markets and ensure energy security.

3. In terms of military affairs, a trinity of military security strategy of "shaping", "response" and "preparation" is proposed to respond to crises at any time and prepare for future challenges.

2. During the George W. Bush Administration (2001-2009): “Preemptive Strike”

Strategy and “Global Democracy” Strategy

20 In the 1990s, with the rise of the "new economy" driven by information technology and high technology in the United States, it greatly promoted the development of the American economy, which also stimulated the United States' global hegemony. After the George W. Bush administration came to power, the growth of the U.S. economy began to slow down, and the global pattern also changed accordingly. The Bush administration first proposed a "preemptive strike" strategy, and then proposed a "global democracy" strategy during its second term. "Culturalization" strategy, its main contents are:

1. Counter-terrorism has become the priority strategic agenda of the United States. After the "9·11" incident, the United States regarded terrorism as its primary threat, and actively adjusted its military security strategy, "preemptively struck" militarily, developed and deployed missile defense systems, and adjusted its nuclear strategy.

2. Adopt "a la carte multilateralism." On the one hand, it uses multilateralism to achieve the purpose of counter-terrorism; on the other hand, it resolutely gets rid of the restrictions on its power and actions by multilateral mechanisms and multilateral cooperation. When it is restricted, it is more inclined to adopt unilateralist strategies.

3. Adjust global geostrategy and build a new framework for international security. While continuing to attach importance to Europe, it will enhance the strategic status of the Middle East and Southwest Asia and maintain stability in Latin America and Africa.

4. Promote democratization globally. Through offensive diplomatic, military, economic and other means, it promotes the concepts of "democracy" and "freedom" around the world to protect and promote the interests of the United States.

3. The global strategic adjustment of the United States after Obama came to power (2009 to present)

After Obama came to power, because he no longer enjoyed the dividends of the Cold War, and because the United States was deeply involved in the Iraq War and the financial crisis Among them, the United States is facing a dilemma unprecedented in recent decades. Obama's primary goal is to resolve the remaining issues in Iraq and to get the United States out of the financial crisis as soon as possible. Through Obama's two overseas visits and Secretary of State Hillary's explanation, the basic framework of his diplomacy should be:

1. Strengthen traditional allies relationship between.

2. Improve relations with China and Russia.

3. Committed to improving the bad image of the United States in the Islamic world.

4. Advocate for dialogue with “hostile countries”.

5. Emphasize cooperation with international organizations and respect for international law.

6. Adopt "smart power diplomacy" that combines hard power and soft power. That is to say, in its diplomatic strategy, the United States must use all the country's means, including all resources in the political, economic, diplomatic, military, legal and cultural fields, to serve the overall goal of U.S. foreign policy.

From the above strategic adjustments, we can see that Obama’s global strategy is more diversified than during the George W. Bush period. Obama is more inclined to influence the world through “the power of example” rather than “the example of strength.” However, Its core is still to maintain the United States' world hegemony.

In short, after the end of the Cold War, the United States’ global strategy evolved from the “engage and expand” strategy of the Clinton administration to the “preemptive” strategy of the George W. Bush administration and the “preemptive strike” strategy proposed during the second term. From the "global democratization" strategy to Obama's new strategic adjustments, although the three administrations have proposed their own unique global strategic frameworks, from a content analysis, the core and goals of their global strategies have always remained unchanged, which is to ensure that the United States is in the 21st century. world leadership.