Which is more cost-effective than Toyota chr or Angola?

I have driven Toyota CHR and Angola before. In the long-term use, I found that the appearance of Toyota CHR is very unique and fashionable, and the interior is also very luxurious and comfortable; Angola has a tough appearance and a simple and practical interior. In terms of performance, Toyota CHR has excellent power and economy, good handling stability, excellent braking performance, first-class ride comfort and strong traffic capacity. Angola, on the other hand, is slightly less dynamic and economical, with poor handling stability and braking performance, but its ride comfort and traffic capacity can still meet daily needs. According to my personal experience and comparison, I come to the conclusion that Toyota CHR is more cost-effective.

Automobile series-Toyota CHR

Angola

Performance comparison using scenario comparison

Scene: Commuting to and from work

-Toyota CHR

Advantages: full of motivation.

Disadvantages: None

Angola

Advantages: Comfortable ride.

Disadvantages: weak motivation

* * Recommended * *: Toyota CHR

Scene: family riding

-Toyota CHR

Advantages: Comfortable ride.

Disadvantages: None

Angola

Advantages: More space.

Disadvantages: poor control

* * Recommended * *: Toyota CHR

Scene: Travel

-Toyota CHR

Advantages: fuel economy

Disadvantages: the luggage compartment is small.

Angola

Advantages: large space

Disadvantages: high fuel consumption.

* * Recommended * *: Toyota CHR

Scene: Exploring the Unknown

-Toyota CHR

Advantages: Strong passing ability.

Disadvantages: None

Angola

Advantages: The chassis is higher.

Disadvantages: the passing ability is slightly weak.

* * Recommended * *: Toyota CHR

Conclusion According to the comparison of automobile performance and usage scenarios, Toyota CHR performs better and has higher cost performance.