Nikon D3 100 and 3200 are better than 5 100? I mainly travel and shoot landscapes, especially panoramic views and night scenes? Which one is so urgent!

Hello, I've been paying attention recently, and I'm going to play a SLR, not asking for a major. Due to budget constraints, I chose these models of Nikon. Canon also has several models, but it varies from person to person.

(1) stand-alone: I've seen machines in physical stores. D3 100 is the earliest on the market, and the price is also low. The key operation is relatively easier than 5 100. However, 5 100 is a flip cover and has certain functions. In contrast, the time to market of D3200 is short, and the operation is similar to D3 100. Buying camera pixels is not the key, even if the LCD screen shows low pixels, it will not affect the viewing on the computer at all. Summary: Personally, I don't like the appearance of the D3200, mainly because it looks uncoordinated as a whole. Considering that D3 100 has been on the market for a long time, I'm afraid it will be refurbished, so considering D5 100, the comments of all websites are acceptable.

(2) Lens: The lens has a great influence on the imaging effect and characteristics. General 18-55 is standard, which is generally enough. The focal length of 18- 105 is more practical. Not too long nor too short, I think it's best.

So my final choice is: d 5100+(18-105), and the current price is nearly 5000. It seems that the single machine has gone up again recently. Alas, I can't afford to get hurt!

I also like taking pictures of the city at night. It is the picture below.

Finally, I hope you can shoot your favorite scenery. O(∩_∩)O~