There are now "five-star local tyrants" public toilets in Chongqing, each with a cost of 654.38+0 million yuan. Is it appropriate to spend huge sums of money to build public toilets?

In any case, it is unreasonable to spend huge sums of money to build public toilets. Imagine that in such a city, when many people live in a corner of the city, some people build villa-style toilets for the so-called "convenience", which is unfair in reality. In addition, is the toilet built funded by the government? !

The Million Dollar Public Toilet in Chongqing was built according to the standard of five-star tourist public toilets in Singapore, aiming at improving the comfort of tourists when they are convenient to travel. However, I would like to ask, does Singapore's tourism industry only rely on millions of expensive public toilets to attract tourists and develop accordingly? Or is there no so-called high-end public toilet, people will not choose this place as a tourist destination and turn to other places, which will lead to the bleak local tourism industry? I'm here to travel, not to go to the bathroom in another place! Tourists' satisfaction and recognition of the tourism process can be improved not by a toilet, but also by garbage bins that can be walked a few steps away, street signs and landscape introductions that can be seen when they look up, the desire of tour guides to earn less and earn extra money, and the real conscience prices of local businesses. ...

On the other hand, the main source of government finance is taxpayers' taxes and fees. Of course, the use of government finance should be supervised by taxpayers, rather than making "public toilets" meet international standards. To say the least, the sky-high public toilets have been built. Who will be responsible for the daily maintenance? Who will pay the bill? After all, it will eventually fall on taxpayers. When government projects cannot be enjoyed by everyone, everyone has to pay the bill. This unfair social treatment will inevitably lead to heated discussion among the masses, and even have a certain impact on social stability and public safety. This is not worth the loss.

Whether it is this expensive toilet or other expensive projects that are not worthy of the name, it is an unreasonable decision made by some politicians who don't understand people's feelings and leave the group. This hot discussion is also to warn some politicians not to lose the "lining" of popular support for the "face" of political achievements.