Which of these two lenses is worth buying? I mainly take photos, taking scenery as the theme?

1. These two lenses are both half-frame image fields, and Sony used for half-frame E-mount has no reflection (micro-single);

2. Sony E18-2 with large zoom is not recommended for the second generation. E18-2 is a Sony lens manufactured by Tenglong, which is the lens with the worst optical quality among all Tianya mirrors, and none of them.

3. If Tianya Mirror needs to be purchased (Tianya Mirror's large zoom is convenient during travel, which is a compromise), it is recommended to choose Sony's silver E18-2 generation (commonly known as thermos cup). The optical quality is much better than that of the black E18-2 second generation, but the disadvantage is that it is a big circle and new products are not easy to buy. If it is not a travel demand, it is not recommended to choose Tianya Mirror;

4. Sony Ultra Wide E1-18 can be selected. Sony's half-non-anti-ultra-wide lens has little choice, among which the better wide-angle lens is Old Frog 9mm/f2.8, but the disadvantage is that it is manual and beginners can't play it. The other is Sigma's 16mmf/1.4 (one of Sigma's Three Musketeers), which is of good quality, but the equivalent viewing angle is only 24mm, which is not wide enough. Only E1-18 and T11-2 are available for zoom wide angle.

5. Among the zoom wide-angle lenses, Tenglong 11-2mm F/2.8 Di III-A RXD is more recommended. Its optical quality is better than Bisogni E1-18, and it has a magnification of 1∶4, a larger aperture, a shorter focusing distance, higher resolution and better edge imaging quality.

6. If the zoom lens is used in daily life, the Tenglong 17-7mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is recommended, and the E18-2 lens is not recommended; If telephoto is needed, Sony 7-35mm lens is recommended.