Want to travel at home, is it cost-effective to buy DV or SLR?

Generally speaking, I personally feel that family travel, SLR is enough, DV is chicken ribs, reasons:

& lt 1 & gt； Preferred photos are far more enjoyable than videos. If relatives and friends visit or have family memories, it is very warm to open the photo album, but the video is different. In addition to being difficult to preserve, the convenience is greatly reduced. So I suggest taking pictures here.

The design significance of<2 & gtDV is to shoot video for a long time, and the camera function can be ignored. If you travel at home, it is rare to see someone taking DV videos from beginning to end, supplemented by video-based photos, right? . SLR is the other way around. Occasionally, shooting videos is mainly based on taking pictures, which meets the actual needs of ordinary people.

& lt3 & gtDV takes photos, and the photos are terrible. The video quality of SLR is good, which is one of its advantages. At present, SLR is very advanced, and the video quality is completely acceptable. Moreover, the SLR can change the lens and play various tricks, which is more playable.

If you value the video function, it is good to recommend Nikon D7000+ 18 200 as the specific model.

& lt 1 & gt； It seems that only Nikon can achieve automatic continuous video focusing at present, and Canon does not have this function, so it can only focus manually.

& lt2> Full Focus Coverage, Cost-effective Tourism Scheme

I hope I can help you.