2021 Community Worker Exam Application Tips: Raise Countermeasure Questions: Judge the Number of Questions to Prevent “Falling into the Pitfalls”

When it comes to posing solution questions, many students will find it difficult. The most confusing thing is the judgment of the number of questions. I don’t know whether the question is correct or not. Two questions, facing the trap laid by the provincial examination questions, directly stepped on the thunder, which affected the content of subsequent answers. But in fact, in the process of learning and answering questions such as proposing countermeasures, there are techniques that can be followed. During the entire problem-solving process, candidates should review the key information of the question clearly as a breakthrough in solving the problem. Next, we will explain to students how to review the number of questions when proposing countermeasures.

Question Type Cognition

In the examination syllabus, the ability requirements for proposing countermeasures are stated as follows (refer to the national examination syllabus):

1. Positions in central agencies and their directly affiliated agencies at the provincial level: Accurately understand and grasp the problems reflected in the given data, and propose measures or methods to solve the problems

2. Positions in directly affiliated agencies at the municipal (prefecture) level and below: For positions given Analyze the problems reflected in the specific data and propose solutions or solutions.

Through the content expression of these two outlines, we will find that both of them tell us the two key points that we need to master to propose countermeasures. The first is to be able to find the problem, and the second is to be able to find the problem. It is to solve the problem. In other words, regardless of whether it is a two-question situation, we need to sort out the existing problems during the question-solving process. So, when does the question need to be written, and why should it not be written? This can all be known from the question itself, so I have summarized the specific methods for you.

Specific methods

In the process of proposing countermeasure questions and reviewing the questions, the situation of a question is easy for candidates to judge. So, how to judge the situation of two questions? It can be divided into three situations:

1. Check whether there are parallel words in the question stem. When there are related parallel expressions such as "and", "and", "simultaneously" and "?" in the question stem, it means that it is necessary to summarize the problems involved in the material and to propose measures to solve the problems. Take the following example question as an example:

The given information describes some problems currently existing in the field of domestic variety shows. Based on the given information, please indicate where these problems are mainly reflected and make corresponding suggestions for improvement.

Requirements: Targeted, concise, reasonable and organized suggestions. No more than 300 words.

Through the question stem, we can clearly find that the parallel word "bin" appears in the question stem, so as to connect the problems and suggestions for improvement. Therefore, this situation can be treated as two questions. First, we should summarize the current problems in the field of domestic variety shows, and then put forward suggestions for improvement in response to the problems.

2. Check whether there are relevant statements in the requirements. Sometimes, although there is no obvious hint in the question stem, we can know it by reading the requirements. When there are expressions like "Comprehensive summary of the problem and precise location of the cause" in the requirements, we should understand that in order to meet such requirements, we need to summarize the problem or cause. One detail needs to be noted here: the cause of the problem is still essentially a statement of the problem, so the problem and the cause can be converted into each other to a certain extent. Therefore, if you see a certain requirement statement for the cause, you should also Do it in the form of "summarizing the problem + proposing countermeasures" in the form of two questions. Take the following example question as an example:

Based on the given information, please analyze the reasons for the current "tourism + Internet" chaos and put forward specific suggestions for solving it.

Requirements: The reasons are summarized accurately and comprehensively; the countermeasures are highly targeted and the suggestions are reasonable and feasible. No more than 350 words.

At this time, for this question, focus on the "requirements" part. You will find that the requirements clearly include specific requirements for "reasons" and "countermeasures and suggestions", so at this time It should be treated as two questions.

3. Check whether the question stem clearly states the problem. This situation is usually a trap that can be set up for candidates, and it is also a slightly difficult place for candidates. At this time, candidates need to carefully analyze the question stem to see whether the question stem clearly expresses a specific aspect of the question. For example, "Propose solutions to the employment problems of college students". At this time, we can find that the "employment problems of college students" include many problems such as college students being unable to find jobs and being dissatisfied with their current jobs. However, the question does not tell which aspect of the problem it is specifically targeted at. , so there are two questions at this time; if we change the question to another way: Propose solutions to the problem of employment difficulties for college students, then we will find that what needs to be solved is "employment difficulties", that is, the specific problem of not being able to find a job. So this is a question at this time. Next, taking the test questions as an example, let us take a look at how the Sichuan Provincial Examination is conducted:

Based on the given information 4-6 in the second half of the 2018 Sichuan Provincial Examination, what measures do you think can be taken to help enterprises How can public institutions better retain talents?

Requirements: Appropriate measures and strong operability; clear ideas and concise language; no more than 500 words.

Regarding this question, we can see that the purpose of our suggestions is to "retain talents", that is, what we need to solve is the single problem of "cannot retain talents", which belongs to the specific problem of talent. An aspect of , so this question is a question.

In the first half of the 2018 Sichuan Provincial Examination, please propose corresponding improvement measures for the problems in urban talent work involved in materials 3 and 4. (30 points)

Requirements: (1) Comprehensive content and appropriate measures; (2) Clear thinking and well-organized layers; (3) Fluent language and neat writing; (4) No more than 500 words.

It is different from the question asked in the second half of 2018. The question asked at this time is "Problems in urban talent work". Then the problems in talent work may include the inability to retain talents, the inability to attract talents, Problems such as poor use of talents are broader in scope and the problem statement is unclear, so this question is divided into two questions.