Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Travel guide - Chongqing woman threatened to get married because her boyfriend committed suicide, and the court revoked the relationship. Does the man have to bear legal responsibility?

Chongqing woman threatened to get married because her boyfriend committed suicide, and the court revoked the relationship. Does the man have to bear legal responsibility?

Ms. Yihuang of Chongqing sued her husband to the court on the grounds of being forced to get married, asking the court to dissolve their marriage relationship. Later, the court learned that before they got married, Ms. Huang proposed to break up, and the man threatened to marry Ms. Huang with suicide. Finally, Ms. Huang gave in and registered for marriage, but she did not live together after marriage. In this case, men do not need to bear legal responsibility.

1. Men don't need to bear legal responsibility. Legally, there are three kinds of legal responsibilities, namely, civil legal responsibility, criminal legal responsibility and administrative legal responsibility. In this case, without the participation of public authorities, administrative legal responsibility is naturally not involved. In this case, the man forcibly registered with Ms. Huang as husband and wife on the grounds of coerced suicide, but according to the law, the coerced marriage relationship seriously violated the legal autonomy of the parties and violated the principle of freedom of marriage, which did not constitute a legal requirement for marriage. The party coerced by law has the right to request the annulment of the marriage against its true meaning. This is what Ms. Huang did in this case. But in this case, this is not the civil legal responsibility of the husband, because the registration of marriage relationship is handled by the civil affairs department, and the execution of the judgment only needs to be handled by the civil affairs department. In fact, the man may be involved in the crime of violent interference with freedom of marriage in criminal law, but in criminal law, the object of violence must be the coerced party. But in this case, the man only threatened the other party with his own life. Strictly speaking, he did not commit violence against Ms. Huang.

Second, regarding the legal revocable marriage relationship, there are two situations of revocable marriage, one is the marriage relationship caused by coercion in this case, and the other is the marriage relationship concluded by one party hiding a serious illness. Most people may misunderstand the revocable marriage relationship. For example, in this case, many people may think that Ms. Wang and her husband have established a marriage relationship, and what needs to be handled now is a divorce. But in fact, as long as the coerced Ms. Huang voluntarily cancels the marriage, the previous marriage relationship does not exist from the beginning, which means that the marriage relationship itself is not established.

What matters in marriage is your feelings and my wishes. China has always advocated the freedom of marriage between men and women in law.