Their parents take care of them, but they only take their in-laws with them when traveling. what do you think?

This problem is a common social problem, and there have been several problems about it before. They are all sons, daughters-in-law and the whole family, taking their parents-in-law out to travel. So far, there has not been a case of a son, daughter-in-law and in-laws traveling together. It is the son and daughter-in-law who condemn the in-laws for not taking care of their children. Why do you ask your parents to go with you, but you have to take your parents-in-law with you when you travel? This is caused by the different dominant positions of husband and wife in the family.

In today's society, most men are at a disadvantage in the family. And a strong woman not only controls all the economic lifelines of her family. We must also support and control all major and minor issues inside and outside, and have a good wife to discuss with her husband. There are also some powerful and autocratic wives who don't care about their husbands at all. Most men would rather make their parents sad than offend their wives to avoid getting into trouble. If everyone can understand this, they will know why parents take care of them when traveling.

As for what I think, I think it's God's will, why everything has become chaotic and upside down now. This is the inevitable result of the prosperity of yin and the decline of yang, and it is not transferred by personal will. Don't go against the sky in everything, just let nature take its course. I believe that although the water is turbid now, it will become clear one day.

Nowadays, a small family has a strange attitude, and the daughter-in-law has the final say. Dare the daughter-in-law tell her son?

Men are not respected and have no status in the family.

answer the question

Let me talk about my personal opinion. According to the description of the subject, I said: At ordinary times, three people are parents-in-law who take care of their lives and children. This trip will take them. Take your parents with you on your next trip. In my opinion, this is normal. From the protagonist's point of view, parents-in-law are guests and should be considerate of them. And there are three people in their parents-in-law's house, so we can travel without them first! If I were you, I would take care of my parents-in-law first.

There is a question about the relationship between host and guest. If the young couple are in their parents-in-law's house, they can't continue to travel without their parents-in-law, but go home to take care of their parents and can't talk to their daughter-in-law! It's rude to parents-in-law! So I think it's normal to bring my in-laws first and my biological parents next time.

This is my opinion.

Where there is cause and effect, there is practice.

If you can afford it and put it down, it will be empty after all.

This in-law is strange. It is enough to serve people every day, and it depends on others' faces. After the holiday, you don't have to wait on others. Why not enjoy life freely with your wife and go out to see a movie? Go out for a western meal. Why do you have to follow someone else's ass? Too careful. How tired you are. The son is raised for others. Who stopped you from having a daughter [what]

The old couple didn't understand: What's wrong with doing more? Why do you always take care of them for free? You can live your own life, stay away from this young couple and travel by yourself, because you don't trust this young couple to take care of you? Who can blame? Maybe at ordinary times, you just do something, but in case of emergency, what is the money your parents-in-law give you?

Who pays? If the mother-in-law pays, it is the father-in-law who takes them to travel, not them. If the younger generation pays, it shouldn't be like this.

/|||| 0/.My parents-in-law are rich.

My parents-in-law like traveling.

In-laws are younger than their parents.

My parents-in-law are followers, and my son and daughter-in-law go wherever they say.

My parents-in-law are healthy and can run and walk.

6. My parents-in-law are not picky about food, so enjoy it.

7. The biggest possibility is that the daughter-in-law earns more money than the son.

8. Daughter-in-law is filial, but unfortunately she is only filial to her parents unilaterally.

Anyway, my son's parents want to go out to play together, so to speak. If go on road trip doesn't have enough five-seaters, they will buy a seven-seater.

Parents take care of themselves, but parents-in-law lead the trip. When you are sick, your parents surround your bed. Maybe your brother-in-law was with his parents when they were ill. Then you will take time to take care of your parents-in-law. What I'm talking about is the difference between men and women. Now, most people who have daughters can get a son back. All those who have sons have brought their sons. When they answer their parents, I will say that they keep them if they have money. If you want to travel, you don't have to disturb your son. Daughter-in-law told his wife to go. So I said that if you can do this as your parents' parents-in-law, you won't be angry because your son and daughter-in-law lead your parents-in-law to travel. We are not angry because we didn't pay!