"I'm dying", why is the tourism industry in Hong Kong depressed?

Recent tourism data show that the number of Hong Kong tourists has decreased significantly, especially the number of mainland tourists has dropped sharply. This is because the recent social unrest in Hong Kong has led to social disorder and the situation is very uncertain. For safety reasons, many tourists who originally wanted to travel to Hong Kong had to temporarily decide to give up their travel plans.

According to incomplete statistics, more than 20 countries and regions, such as China, the United States, Britain, Japan, South Korea and Canada, have issued different degrees of travel warnings to Hong Kong, calling on citizens to be vigilant and pay attention to travel safety. In fact, this is to persuade the domestic people not to go to Hong Kong before the threat of unrest is lifted, so as to avoid danger.

Hong Kong's "angry youths" blindly use violent demonstrations to attack the police and innocent people who maintain stability by force, which seriously threatens people's lives. Earlier, tourists were besieged by Hong Kong youths who marched violently at the Hong Kong airport, causing panic. Everyone turned pale when they heard "Hong Kong". As a result, more and more people canceled their plans to travel to Hong Kong, and the tourism industry in Hong Kong continued to decline.

In order to get out of the predicament of this peak season as soon as possible, the biggest demand of Hong Kong's tourism industry at present is that the society can restore peace. If we condone the occurrence of violent shocks, it will not only continue to seriously affect the development of Hong Kong's tourism industry, but also affect the development of Hong Kong's economy, and will also affect the lives of Hong Kong's grassroots citizens.

From the past to the present, Hong Kong's tourism industry has been booming. The biggest reason is that people are afraid of social chaos, and the best way to solve this problem is to stop violence and restore the stability of social order. What do you think of this?