How did you come to the conclusion that Wuhan is the city you want to visit most?

There are still some problems with your own argument. For example, this paragraph:

In a report released by the Tourism Research Center of China Academy of Social Sciences on the trend of tourism demand under the epidemic situation, Wuhan has become the city that netizens want to travel most.

This has also received strong support from the list.

In 2020, more than 259 million tourists punched cards in Wuhan, contributing nearly 300 billion in tourism revenue, which helped Wuhan's tourism industry development index score second only to Chongqing. This popularity continued until the National Day this year, and Wuhan became the only city in China that received more than 20 million tourists. As the "wind vane" of local punching, the Yellow Crane Tower received more than 50,000 people in a single day, approaching the maximum reception capacity of the scenic spot.

To tell the truth, I often brush the reports of the Tourism Research Institute and the local cultural tourism bureaus.

There are three reasons that have been ignored.

First, the regional siphon function of Wuhan as the political and economic center of Hubei. Obviously, in the post-epidemic era, everyone's way of traveling and playing is mainly in the province, which is characterized by short distance.

If your, the editor of 265438+20th Century Business Herald, brushes all the reports of the Tourism Research Institute, we will see that the travel radius and travel time of tourists in the epidemic era are generally shortened after the analysis of the Institute in the early stage. As the center of Hubei, Wuhan naturally undertakes more reception tasks here.

Second, Hubei Province is the first time since the recovery of the epidemic.