Traveling in the debate is not the correct concept of tourism.

First of all, the security risks of poor travel are very prominent. You can check the safety accident rate of accommodation methods such as sofa passengers. Secondly, poor travel is limited by time and destination type. Those who have enough time and can walk slowly without getting on the bus can only travel poorly when the friendliness of the tourist destination reaches a certain level. When a tourist destination lacks friendliness, trust and even necessary economic foundation, it is impossible to provide a smooth environment for the poor. For example, in the second and third tier cities in China, the public transportation system is underdeveloped, and even there are few accommodation places like youth travel, so it is difficult for poor tourists to have soil for growth. Finally, in the process of poor travel, more attention is paid to solving the problem of food, shelter and transportation, and the travel experience will be greatly reduced, which is obviously not what most busy people in modern society want to see in their precious trips only once or twice a year. Therefore, poor travel is only the imagination of some tourists, and it is not a concept that can be widely accepted and recognized.

Starting with a backpack, buying a train ticket or bus ticket from one city to another, staying in a cheap hotel and eating a cheap travel meal, that's not a poor trip. The real poor travel is to take a free car, stay in a free hotel and eat a free meal, instead of being desperate and not spending money to solve the problem of food, housing and transportation. So poor travel is a game for very few people.

I hope it helps you!