Will the liberal arts college entrance examination scores generally be improved compared to the same model?

With the resumption of high school senior year in various places, many senior high school students have ushered in the real "one-model" exam. According to past experience, some students will be "severely hit" after the first-model exam, because most students Treat the review as an opportunity to get "rebirth". If you don't do well in the test this time, your hope will be dashed. Some students may even give up on themselves. This is quite dangerous. Falling before the finish line is very dangerous. Regretful.

As a teacher, I will soothe students' emotions at this time. Some teachers said to students: The college entrance examination is easier than ever. As long as everyone persists to the end, there is no problem in improving by 30 points! Is this statement meant to encourage "white lies" told by students, or is it true? 1. Comparison of college entrance examination scores and first-model scores

In order to make the results more convincing, I compared and analyzed the college entrance examination scores of the previous class of students and the first-model scores. This is a liberal arts class. As for the scores, half of the class was general arts students and half were art students. Since the art students did not take the model exam, I only analyzed the scores of the general arts students.

Through the comparison of these data, the following four conclusions can be drawn:

1. Compared with the same model scores, students’ college entrance examination scores have improved and will be improved, but only one student has dropped. Scored 13 points, and other students all improved.

2. From the perspective of the increase, some students exceeded 40 points, and some students only improved by 2.5 points, but most students improved by 20 to 40 points.

3. Although the scores have generally improved, the class rankings have not changed much. For example, the top 5 students in the first-model exam are still the same 5 students, but the order has changed, and the rankings of other students have not fluctuated much.

4. Students with good grades will improve even more in the later period. The top 5 in the class improved by 39.5 points, 24 points, 48 ??points, 33 points and 45.5 points respectively.

This data is only an analysis of one class and cannot draw a general conclusion, but it can also provide inspiration to students: as long as they return to school well later, improving by 30 points is definitely not a dream! 2. Why are college entrance examination scores generally higher than those in the first model?

For most students, the results of the college entrance examination are better than those of the model test, which is determined by the following factors:

1. From the perspective of propositions, the results of the model test are better , is often more difficult than the college entrance examination:

As a mock exam, the main goal is not to select and rank students, but to discover problems existing in the preparation process, then find out and fill in the gaps, and guide subsequent resumption of studies, so In terms of propositions, although the questions in the model exam all simulate the college entrance examination questions, some simple questions are abandoned, making the overall difficulty more difficult.

As for the college entrance examination questions, as selective questions, there is a certain proportion of difficulty. The mid- and low-end questions account for about 80% to facilitate the selection of students, so the difficulty is relatively low, while the difficult questions The difficulty level is often higher than that of the model exam, which fully reflects its selection characteristics.

2. From the perspective of marking, the marking of the model examination is not as fair as the marking of the college entrance examination

The college entrance examination adopts a "dual assessment" mode. Two teachers read a student's test paper at the same time, and the score difference is calculated. When a certain set standard is exceeded, a third teacher "arbitration" will be activated to ensure fairness in grading to the greatest extent.

In order to mark the papers faster and because the number of teachers is limited, the model examination often adopts a "single assessment" mode, so it is more subjective and prone to some problems, and there is a lot of teacher pressure. , which has a greater impact on students.

3. From the perspective of preparation, teachers and students are not ready for the first model test.

The first model test is just a summary of a round of review, and does not mean that the review Finish. A round of review is often aimed at "laying a solid foundation and establishing a system." However, students' knowledge is not integrated enough, the number of questions has not increased significantly, and their ability to do questions is lacking, so it is normal for students to not do well in the exam.

From a teacher's perspective, the model exam also provides teachers with a reference to correct their own teaching objectives and teaching methods through students' results, and make up for some problems in teaching.

So, from these perspectives, it is normal for students to do unsatisfactorily in the first model exam, and it is not a bad thing to do unsatisfactory at this time. If treated correctly, bad things can be resolved Convert into something good. 3. What issues should we pay attention to in the late senior year of high school?

The end of the model exam means that the senior year review has truly entered the later stage. In the last two months, students still have a lot of room for improvement. Why do the top students get more points? It is because they have done more solid work in one round of review, and the subsequent review will be more efficient.

In the late third year of high school, how can you review more efficiently? Teacher Yingzai Senior High School will give you some suggestions:

1. A good attitude will help you review efficiently

In the late third year of high school, the biggest "enemy" is not your competitors, but yourself, and your own biggest problems are often psychological problems.

In the late third year of high school, there will be more and more exams, from monthly exams to weekly exams, and the weather is getting hotter and hotter. Coupled with the special situation this year, many students are closed to school, which may cause psychological problems. .

Countermeasures: Treat every exam correctly. If you do well, you can be happy, but don't get carried away, because this is not a college entrance examination; if you don't do well, you can be sad, but don't be pessimistic and despair, because this is not a college entrance examination. Therefore, you need to treat the exam with peace of mind. If you are under too much pressure, you can keep a diary, run, talk to classmates and teachers, etc. You can also learn Ah Q’s "Spiritual Victory Method". If you are not good at reviewing by yourself, others will not be good at reviewing either. Sometimes you "deceive yourself and others" "A little will make you calmer.

2. If you ignore the basics, you will definitely be punished

What will be tested in the college entrance examination? The Examination Center of the Ministry of Education proposed "one body, four layers and four wings", which answers the questions of "why to take the test", "what to take the test" and "how to take the test".

Why take the exam? ——"Integration": "cultivating people with moral integrity, service selection, and guided teaching";

What is the test? —— "Four levels": "Essential knowledge, key abilities, subject literacy, core values";

How to take the test? ——"Four wings": "basic, comprehensive, applied, innovative";

Through this "one body, four layers and four wings", we can see that the "essential knowledge" for the college entrance examination has "Basic" features. However, during the second round of review, students often neglect basic knowledge because they do too many questions, and even lose the "results" of the first round of review. As a result, they enter a "bottleneck period" where they answer more and more questions and make more and more mistakes. many.

Countermeasures: During the second and third rounds of review, be sure not to relax in the implementation of basic knowledge. For basic knowledge, two methods can be adopted.

One is to establish a knowledge framework. This is a very useful learning method. The core of establishing a knowledge framework is to classify, manage and associate knowledge so that you can have a macro understanding of the knowledge you have learned. . This is just like when we draw a big tree, we usually draw its branches first, and then the leaves. If we worry about how to draw each leaf, we will not be able to draw the big tree well. The same is true for learning. Many students are very familiar with some detailed knowledge points, but if you ask them about the framework of the entire unit or the entire book, they cannot tell you at all. However, the knowledge of the college entrance examination questions is highly connected, and these must be mobilized in a short time. To solve problems using knowledge points, you must be absolutely familiar with the knowledge. Building a knowledge framework is the best way. If you don’t know how to establish it, you can take the simplest method. Organize the large and small contents of the textbook, memorize them by heart, and gradually establish the connection between these knowledge. By doing the questions, you can find out the knowledge points that are often tested and the mistakes that are easy to make. Mark the knowledge points. At this time, you will find that the knowledge is not messy, but very regular.

The other is to make good use of the "Feynman Learning Method". Simply put, it means to be able to speak out the knowledge you have learned, either to yourself or to your classmates. The process of speaking is The process of in-depth understanding of knowledge, and strengthening it when there is a "stuck" somewhere, is a very effective way to implement basic knowledge.

3. Don’t blindly "brush the questions", but "do the questions carefully"

In the late third year of high school, the most common mistake is to "brush the questions" and jump into the "sea of ??questions". This is a very bad practice, because the questions are not only numerous, but also confusing and mixed. If you do not do well, you will become less and less directionless and less confident.

Countermeasures: Take each set of questions seriously and ask for points for "wrong questions". Doing one set of questions carefully is more effective than ten sets of questions. Doing one question carefully is more effective than ten questions. Don't be greedy for more questions and seek speed. When you finish a set of questions, the real gain is not how many points you got, but how many points you lost and which questions you got wrong. You have to thank these questions, which allowed you to discover the problem in advance.

For wrong questions, you must first analyze the cause of the error. Generally speaking, there are two reasons: vague knowledge point or insufficient ability to solve the question. For the former, you need to find the chapter where the knowledge point is located and take a careful look. Relevant knowledge points and strengthen implementation. If it is a problem with question-solving ability, it is necessary to analyze in detail whether it is a problem in the question review phase or the question answering phase. Only by finding the problem can we prescribe the right remedy.

Secondly, we need to sort out the wrong questions by type. When time is limited, to do the questions efficiently, we must try our best to make one question into a type of question. This classification process is The process of generalization and induction is a very important ability. Here I will tell you a little trick. You can use the wrong question books that you have sorted out before and make a "catalogue" to classify these wrong questions.

Finally, we need to carry out "thinking modeling" and "question model modeling". The college entrance examination is not an arbitrary test. The abilities and qualities tested in the college entrance examination are fixed, and the questioners are basically fixed. This is also It is decided that the college entrance examination questions are also fixed, so by classifying and organizing the question types, a "programmed" thinking and model must be established. For example, when doing history questions, when we do "influence" questions, we need to think "divergently", usually "from small to large", from near to far, and think about its impact from the positive aspects, negative aspects, and the impact at that time. From the perspective of influence on future generations, etc., "templates" are established. These "templates" must be established in daily life. Most of the questions in the college entrance examination can be directly "applied".

So, as long as you find the right direction, find the right method, strengthen your confidence, and improve by 30 points, no problem!