What did the government do in foggy days?

Because all the basic government supplies are special, such as food, buses and so on. But fresh air is not provided by the government.

Therefore, the severe smog days for several days have made China people angry again. On February 8th, 65438, Morphy, a well-known host, published a Weibo, pointing out that "the government is the biggest person responsible for environmental disasters". Murphy cited several reasons, for example, backward production capacity led to industrial emissions and environmental disasters, and local officials were worried about affecting GDP and were not active in eliminating backward production capacity. The government can do nothing to control smog, and calling on people to drive less to solve smog is a diversion.

Although some experts and scholars believe that residents' cooking and automobile exhaust are important reasons for the smog in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. However, the report made by Greenpeace, an environmental protection organization, and the research team of Leeds University in the United Kingdom believes that the energy supply structure that relies too much on coal has a great impact on PM2.5 pollution in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. According to reports, the total energy consumption in Hebei Province in 20 12 years reached 302 million tons of standard coal, of which coal consumption was 27 10/00000 tons, accounting for 89.6% of the total energy consumption, nearly 20 percentage points higher than the national average. According to the report data, the contribution of coal combustion to smog accounts for 25% of a PM2.5 particulate matter emission. In terms of industry, industrial emission sources such as coal-fired power plants, steel mills and cement plants are the main pollution sources in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei.

On the issue of smog control, the relevant government departments "don't shoot tigers, just catch flies", staring at the citizens' stoves all day, but turning a blind eye to the colorful pollutants discharged from chimneys, but some media are also responsible for exaggerating "flies" infinitely. In the face of smog control, the government has the responsibility of the government and the people have the responsibility of the people. What is the "main course" and what is the "side dish", the government departments must weigh clearly. If the "main course" is only a measure of sending more sprinklers or "washing the city by the whole people" and there is no way to eradicate industrial pollution, how can it be possible for "side dishes" to be served on the main table?

Everyone is looking forward to a green China, and different subjects also need to shoulder their due responsibilities to control smog. However, if people who call for smog control are called "ignorance or 250", it is precisely tearing the foundation of this * * * governance and evading the government's responsibility to control smog.

Controlling smog tests the government's governance system and governance capacity, which inevitably requires citizen participation and social cooperation. In this process, it is inevitable for individuals to vent their emotions. A responsible government department will generously take citizens' spit and emotional catharsis as the driving force to cure smog. Everyone yearns for a green life, but relying solely on the "green life" of the individual people is far from getting rid of the gloomy smog.