Seeking in-depth argument

The poverty problem you mentioned now is much better than that after 60 years ago or before the reform and opening up. At least, at present, even in poor areas, as long as there is strong labor at home, people are generally hungry, which was not the case 20 years ago.

As for the sufferings of ordinary people, I think we should distinguish between urban residents and rural residents here. Let's talk about farmers first. Now the life of farmers in most areas is definitely better than in the past, and some areas are still developing rapidly. Of course, it does not rule out that the northwest and Yunnan-Guizhou-Sichuan areas are still affected by the weather and geographical environment, and there are still many poor people. But at least, judging from the institutional reform of the national government in recent years, the burden on farmers is much less than in the past. And why can't farmers in China be as relaxed as those in developed countries abroad? The main reason is that China has a large rural population, less arable land and too few per capita resources. If all the farmers in China are rich, it means that 70% of the population of 654.38+300 million are rich. Such a goal is too far away. Solving the problem of farmers' food and clothing is the first step of reform and opening up. As for getting rich, it can only be realized after the rural population is reduced to a certain extent and the agricultural mechanization reaches a certain standard and popularization rate. I am afraid that no government can solve this phenomenon in a short time.

The main problem is urban residents. China is an underdeveloped country, and a few developed cities in China still rely on policies, not market economy, and this is still the case. Today, our information exchange is so convenient and the traffic is developed. Lured by these cities, the distribution of population mobility in China is quite uneven. When wealth and population are concentrated in a few places, it will have a serious impact on other poor or relatively backward areas, and our country is so big. How much central financial allocation can other cities get each year? I'm afraid there isn't much money. . . Because it is unscientific for the central government to allocate funds to develop cities in today's market economy. If the government doesn't give money, then we have to make our own money, so there will be local protection of enterprises, including Sanlu. I won't say much about this question.

There are several other questions. First, the social problems brought about by the excessive population expansion, including public security, transportation, housing and so on. The most important thing is that the competition is becoming more and more fierce, so the degree of oppression is higher than in the past. In the past, the competition in China was not fierce because of the insufficient information circulation and the small population. Everything is like this. Too much is worthless, and so are people. So to tell the truth, China people are worthless or something, which is actually a necessity. The existence of competition objectively divides society into three or six categories. Simply classify according to economic ability and rights. What you said about the gap between the rich and the poor and the degree of oppression is simply a matter of time. The gap between the rich and the poor objectively gives the rich the capital to oppress the poor, and the existence of oppression is also one of the reasons that aggravate the gap between the rich and the poor. There are many indicators to see whether a society is harmonious, civilized and stable, but simply speaking, the most ideal composition of a society should be middle-class families. The poor can't disappear completely, but not too many rich people, so as to achieve balance. Of course, in China, I am afraid that this goal will not be achieved after 50 years. Why? Because all cities in China are determined by achievements, and political career is determined by achievements. Merit depends on how much tax you collect from the enterprise every year and how many image projects you have. Therefore, under the general environment that domestic political achievements determine everything, the number of rich people objectively determines the political achievements of government departments in this city.

To define the middle class, take Beijing as an example. According to a survey, the most painful category of people is those with a monthly income of 4,000-5,000. The reason is whether the salary is high or not. It is very rare for these people to earn four or five thousand yuan a month. However, considering the relative decent work and the face-saving of China people, we can buy a house and a car, but we can't afford a big house and a good car. At least 3000-5000, but not too wronged. You must also consider the employment of your future children. You can't make do with everything, but you are short of money. Living with a monthly income of 2000-4000 is easier. They don't want to live a luxurious life, and basically they don't want to pursue anything beautiful. In short, a normal life will do. In Beijing, the standard to truly become a middle class is a monthly income of 7,000 to 8,000 yuan or more. . . Most people who earn more than 7,000 yuan a month in Beijing have to work for at least 5 years to 10 years, accounting for less than 15%. In such a big city, with so few middle classes, social harmony is strange. The most fundamental reason for the unreasonable wage structure is the unreasonable tax system. State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China said at the beginning of the year that although China's personal income tax rate is relatively high, in fact, only 7% of the total domestic tax revenue comes from personal income tax. This means that you should not always talk about the interests of taxpayers.

But the problem is that this statement has moisture. Because 70% of the country's rural population does not need to pay personal income tax. Among the urban population, low-income people and pensioners do not need it either. Needless to say, the taxes levied on the rich in China are very low and common. Therefore, the number of middle-class families in China is small, mainly because among the population of 654.38+0.3 billion, the number of taxpayers is too small and the proportion is too concentrated on a few people. . These people are the most important consumer groups in China at present, and they also create the most value. This is because the causes of many social phenomena and economic problems are interrelated. The gap between the rich and the poor and the problem of oppression are, in the final analysis, caused by too many poor people in China.

If we want to discuss this problem in depth, I'm afraid 65438+ million words is not enough. In addition, corruption, the families of police and bandits, the dereliction of duty of government departments, and the delay in solving education problems are all part of the reasons for these problems.

Moreover, there are three mountains on the heads of ordinary people, housing problems, children's education problems and old-age insurance to see a doctor. . .

To put it simply, I don't know whether the government really needs to take so much money from the people before the state institutions can operate. In fact, the central government should manage the deficit like other developed countries, and return the money from public funds for eating and drinking, buying cadres' buildings and buying buses to the people, which is the fundamental solution to these problems.