Armed assault 3 or battlefield 1, which configuration is more demanding?

Personally, I think arma3 has higher requirements for configuration! In fact, this is directly related to the performance of the landlord's computer ... I play more than 6000 desktop configurations, and I haven't turned on the highest special effects yet ... The landlord's computer performance is not enough, so you can turn down the special effects in the settings!

In a word, armed assault 3 is definitely the king of pictures, and it is also the first PC game that obviously distanced itself from this generation. It has entered the next generation in terms of scale and image quality. Compared with the recent PC monopoly, Rome 2 and Hero 2 have surpassed not a little. Before the next generation of games appear in large numbers, the title of the strongest image quality will still be in its hands. Compared with the vague and gloomy picture of the previous work, the progress of the new work is amazing. Very similar to the newly listed GTA5, the game has almost no obvious color cast in normal light, and it is very bright and eye-catching. Giving various colors to the game screen depends on the weather system and day and night cycle in the game to simulate the real situation and make the colors ever-changing.