Is it a coincidence that the Air Egypt Boeing 777 cargo plane caught fire at Pudong Airport?

Air Egypt Boeing 777 cargo plane caught fire at Pudong Airport, which should be caused by equipment failure. There is no coincidence. In recent years, many failures have occurred in Boeing Company, because more and more Boeing products are used in the world. In proportion, the fault is within the normal range, but Boeing still needs to reflect on the product quality control. After all, the loss of aviation accidents is immeasurable.

Monopoly enterprises will eventually decline: we know that if an enterprise is in the leading position for a long time, it is easy to form monopoly operation, and enterprises lacking competition will show all kinds of arrogance. Boeing has shown this performance, such as the data transmission problem of aircraft black box. We all know that once the plane breaks down, all the data have to be analyzed by the black box, which was understandable in the past, because the network environment at that time could not meet the requirements and we had to go back and analyze it. Now satellite communication is quite complete. It is not technically difficult to open the real-time monitoring system of black box data as soon as possible, but Boeing has not made any adjustments so far.

Imagine if there were real-time black box monitoring, then the abnormality of Malaysia Airlines MH370 before the accident would be monitored, instead of being heard from for so many years because the black box could not be found. This was an avoidable disaster, and so was this fire. If the black box can send back abnormal data in advance and give an early warning (this function has already been realized in the transportation of dangerous goods vehicles, which is not a high-tech technology, and the aircraft only needs to transmit data via satellite, which is relatively expensive), then it will.

The aviation industry lacks competition. The United States obviously lacks competition because there are only a few companies in the aviation industry. We are not comparing the quality of the products, because you have no choice. Civil aircraft are mainly Boeing and Airbus. They don't update technology, so users have no choice. In fact, the real-time monitoring of aircraft working parameters and the realization of early warning function are not technical problems, but the service attitude of enterprises.

Many aviation disasters can be avoided: we all know that air crashes are very harmful and there are many factors that lead to air crashes. Human factors, the most important factor is equipment failure, so self-monitoring and early warning of equipment is particularly important. Imagine, if this plane can warn and send relevant data in real time, then as a monitor, it will get the running state of the plane in advance, and it is possible to avoid this fire. Fortunately, this time it is on the ground. If it is in the air, its loss is immeasurable.

Reflection: product quality is always its most tenacious vitality, and full functions can also increase its chips. I hope Boeing can learn this lesson and stop being arrogant. In fact, many such enterprises were eventually eliminated. We know that Siemens mobile phones and Nokia mobile phones were squeezed out of the market in this way. I hope Boeing will not improve product quality and service.

It is no coincidence that Boeing caught fire. Quality and functional defects are the most likely. I hope Boeing will pay attention to them.