The art gallery is on fire. A famous painting and a cat can only save one. Who can you save?

Recently, I was reading Kipa's Story, and there was a debate topic: "The Art Gallery is on fire. A famous painting and a cat can only save one. Who can you save? "

I'm also thinking about this issue in the debate over big coffee.

I suddenly remembered the movie "The Son of the Weather" I watched some time ago. At that time, my feeling after watching it was: "The picture quality and music are impeccable, and the plot may be very controversial."

Why did I think the plot was controversial at that time? Is it because I think it is not advisable to give up a city for one person? Or is it difficult to choose between these two choices in your mind?

If I were the protagonist of "The Son of the Weather", regardless of the element of "day", would I choose to save Yang Cai or the market?

There is a famous saying in Jin Yong's novels: Great men serve the country and the people.

In other words, after self-selection, it is great men who are willing to sacrifice themselves to become a whole, not ordinary people.

I think this sentence has multiple meanings, one is to choose actively, the other is to praise chivalry, and the third is to allow the ordinary.

Not for the country and people, not a hero, but at least not a sinner.

Of course, the world will always respect and admire those who sacrifice themselves for others-this is the beauty of our human nature.

But it's hard after all. Many people will not make reluctant sacrifices, but as long as they don't hurt others, this is normal and tolerable.

Of course, in the inheritance of human civilization, the spirit of sacrifice and chivalry has always been respected because it is hoped that more people can sacrifice themselves and make more people happy when they can or even need more sacrifices.

But still, once in a while, someone feels overwhelmed after choosing and gives up. That's not a crime. There's no need for criticism.

This tolerance is also a very important and beautiful part of our human civilization.

I like Qipa's theory, because I think the significance of this program lies in deconstructing the mediocrity of traditional ideas, constructing a multicultural expression and changing the traditional ideas and stereotypes of its audience.

This program seems to be reorganizing this society that will lose its three views at any time, like a thoughtful book. Now, share their experience, knowledge, insight and wisdom with everyone in a way of speaking, and then let yourself think about life. ......

Watch the program and find that there are many differences between people, then accept your own differences and understand others' differences. I believe that such multiple collisions will make all kinds of voices in the world have a place to speak!

What surprised me most in this debate was Li's birthday.

In the debate, Huang Zhizhong, the debater of the "seven tyrants", was very good at "attaching importance", and he advocated saving paintings.

Huang Zhizhong threw out a "lofty value" as soon as he came up. He believes that the higher people's cognitive level, the more they can hear "further crying" ...

He gave an example of a teacher. In class, the teacher asked everyone to read the primary school text "Back", which made them feel sad when they read the old waist bent by their father, but many children laughed at their father, so he thought that the higher people's cognition, the deeper their empathy would be.

Painting represents the eternal desire of countless people in the past. The cat is crying nearby, and the famous painting is crying in the distance. We preserve paintings not because they are cold-blooded, but because we see deeper and hear farther.

On the contrary, Li's birthday is more grounded. His first few lovely arguments made everyone laugh, and the last one surprised me:

"Don't care about the crying nearby, can you care about the crying in the distance?"

"Living in a selfish way that doesn't hurt others can maintain the normal operation of the world."

"It is those who are desperate to sacrifice their kittens for a great cause and lofty goals that often put our world in flames."

He believes that if we overemphasize lofty values, from a historical point of view, we should be alert to the mainstream and authority, and we should see clearly the individual sacrifice that the idealist's grand narrative may bring. It is those self-righteous intellectuals who push others to the fire pit again and again in their self-righteous arrangements and their influence on the fate of others. This passage made me applaud frequently.

In our society that advocates collectivism and ignores individual freedom, we have to say that Li Dan's speech is inspiring, which can be said to be a wonderful satire on intellectuals.

Li Dan was once an idealist. After several college entrance examinations and setbacks in life, he began to live more and more thoroughly. However, a bald man born after 90' s repeatedly "threatened" others under the lofty moral banner.

Why is it that Li's birthday is funny, even without too many sensational words, it can arouse the following applause?

Li Dan knows the minds of small people and big people too well. He saw those irreconcilable contradictions at the intersection of two kinds of people's fates. The selfishness he expressed is the true sympathy of human beings and the driving force for the continuation of human civilization.

In the workplace, the boss draws you a big cake every day and tells your company to support you every day. What is it that you sacrifice yourself to make some contribution to the company?

So you went back to your station and silently accepted the 996 working system.

Why? Because we all have to learn to sacrifice ourselves for others!

In 20 12, a movie "20 12" that shocked the time was on fire. At one time, everyone even imagined what we would do if the end of the world really came.

Noah's ark can only carry a few people, but standing at the top, in their minds, in order to maintain the continuation of human species, it is necessary to board high-quality genes, so what should the rest of the people do if they start to make trouble?

Answer: Give you value and tell you that Noah's Ark is only this big, and they don't want to, because for the continuation of our race, you must learn to give up the ego for the bigger one.

When I think of The Avengers, Thanos sacrificed others recklessly to achieve a so-called balanced world, and in this world, no one is qualified to do so, and no one has ever been so qualified.

I used to think that some people might live in an infinite pattern. Later, I thought that no one would be free from the so-called pattern, because they read too many books. They might live in their own imaginary world and think that there is something to save. Those who live comfortably may only have a small world, but they have also passed through this world and seen through the essence of life. It seems that they live their own lives and do not interfere in other people's lives, which is the best harmonious state in the world.