Blind people are refused to stay in hotels without escort. Is the reason for the hotel's refusal valid?

When a blind man checked into a hotel, he was told that he could not stay without an escort. Although the hotel's statement is tenable, from a moral point of view, the hotel's practice is not recognized. Because the hotel can do more things for him and provide him with some help. We should not choose to stand idly by in order to avoid our responsibilities. We should provide as much help as possible for the blind.

First of all, hotels can help them. Although the law does not clearly stipulate that hotels must help blind people when they check in, hotels can take the initiative to help them out of humanistic care, which can better reflect the hotel's customer-oriented service concept. As a blind person, it is bound to be difficult to travel. If the hotel can provide him with some help, it can also reduce many obstacles.

Secondly, hotels should not stand idly by in order to avoid responsibility. Although the hotel refused to check in for the blind, it was worried that something might happen to the blind if he was left unattended, and he was afraid that he could not get away from the relationship, so he chose to refuse to check in. But as a hotel, after all, there are so many waiters, you can send a waiter to help the blind instead of doing nothing to avoid responsibility.

We should give the blind as much help as possible. The world we see is colorful, but it is dark in the world of the blind. They have suffered too much, so we should give them as much help as possible so that they can still have hope in this world.

This incident also triggered a discussion. I hope to give preferential treatment to the blind in the future, and similar news will not appear again. ?

Readers, what do you think? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area for discussion. ?